• ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I am aware of the poem. That was not what I was confused about. You misunderstood me.

    I found the artists original work and the sign was very deliberately made vague. You and I both had the correct interpretations, my interpretation was using a different definition of the word “came”. Sorry if I did not make that clear.

    The artist deliberately made the front running character “sexualized” with eyeliner and was doubly poking fun at the anti-communist socialist and the “degenerate” modern communist. Reactionary, but a good way to get two birds with one stone.

      • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        No, they are using the trope of modern communists being horny-brained and only capable of thinking about sex while making everything sexual. The sign is a double entendre of the person being horny for someone “coming” to/for them.

        This is a common reactionary line of attack used against LGBT communists in particular. Eyeliner is also a common trope of depicting sexualized individuals since the makeup is associated with sexual online subcultures.

        • SU-34@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          No, they are using the trope of modern communists being horny-brained and only capable of thinking about sex while making everything sexual. The sign is a double entendre of the person being horny for someone “coming” to/for them

          Wait, I thought it was supposed to be misogynistic? I thought that was a bit of a stretch but you can’t be serious - I don’t understand how you could draw the conclusion that the figure is portrayed as being “horny”. You’re reading into depth that this MS Paint stick figure cartoon simply does not have.

        • La Dame d'Azur@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          The “came for” is very clearly referring to the persecution of communists in reference to the poem it is quoting.

          There’s nothing sexual about it. There’s nothing misogynistic about it. It is a caricature of an anti-communist “socialist”.

          They are celebrating anti-communism from the Left. It’s not subtle so I don’t understand how you missed it.

          • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            I misunderstood a single post, thanks for beating down. I guess I am that stupid that I missed something not that subtle. You didn’t add anything to the discussion that wasn’t already said but thanks for driving the point home. Great discussion.