• GNUTup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Orchestrating a scenario in which the only possible outcome is self-defense by deadly force sounds an awful lot like premeditated murder, to me. I think you should reevaluate what you consider pedantry.

      • GNUTup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People attacked him because he had a big gigantic deadly gun and was goading a literal angry mob with the gun.

        It’s now more clear to me than ever that you are intentionally acting in bad faith. What is wrong with you?

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          People are attacking him because he has a big gigantic deadly gun

          He has a right to carry a gigantic gun.

          goading

          Carrying a gun is not considered goading by any sane person.

          • GNUTup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It absolutely is considered goading. If lifting your shirt to reveal a gun holstered can be considered a threat (one that police can legally shoot you over) then carrying a rifle at a protest and starting shit with the protestors is also a threat.

            He didn’t go there to make his voice heard — he went there to intimidate and kill.

            • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.worldBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              then carrying a rifle at a protest and starting shit with the protestors is also a threat.

              If a person threatens someone and gets attacked, he cannot claim self-defense. The jury decided he did not threaten them. It would have been murder otherwise and he would be in prison.

                • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  So why don’t we have you decide instead of juries? You clearly know better than the rest of the population. /s

                  • GNUTup@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    /uj

                    If every version of you present on a jury could be replaced with someone like me, the justice system would probably function better than it does now.

                    /rj

                    Get fucked, bootlicker.