“Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to donate $1 million to Donald Trump’s inauguration fund, reports Axios. The donation will be a personal donation directly from Cook rather than a donation from Apple”

I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

    • Nightwatch Admin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      Or it is protection money. “Nice apple you got there, would be a shame if anyone took a bite out of that”….

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Why would Tim Cook be assosiated with Apple in trumps mind?

        Apple is owned by Tim Apple.

        Kind of strange that this line cook is able to afford a small 1 million dollar loan…what? You think trump knows that a loan is different than a donation? You think he knows you’re supposed to pay back loans?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 months ago

    As a Bi man there is something that particularly stings about a well known, openly gay CEO funding a man who is hateful towards LGBTQ+ people. I never really liked him nor apple but it is an extra fuck you.

    Being rich is ultimately the disease as it compels him to appeal to power but I hope the last things hears is “Told you I would kill you last”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      His in-group is not LGBTQIA+, it is other rich people. The same is true for all of them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        The wealthy all seem to understand that class solidarity is more important than any other issue. Why is it taking so long for everyone else to figure that out?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Peter Thiel is also a gay man, and pulling a lot of these strings behind the scenes.

      It’s oligarchy. Thiel can fuck who ever he wants (and make them disappear when he’s done…) while maintaining political power by sacrificing queer people to the Hour of Hate.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      There are no real allies in the oligarch class. Temporal alliances or common goals at best. They will (and do) kill for a penny.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 months ago

    I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

    Why would you do that though? The only thing I’m aware of that they do even remotely better than anyone else is privacy. But it’s not that much better, and it comes at the cost of gestures at everything else

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      IDK why people say they have better privacy: They just settled a lawsuit over evesdroping using Siri. I think they probably have less interest than Google in selling data for advertising, mostly likely using it internally for their ecosystem so they probably come across more privacy focused but I assume they snoop just as much as any other big tech company.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        less interest than Google in selling data for advertising

        Google don’t sell data. The data is what makes them valuable, so it wouldn’t make sense. If they did sell data, the other big tech companies would just buy their data to remove their competitive advantage.

        What Google actually sells is your attention. Advertisers can target people based on demographic data, things you like, etc, but the advertiser never sees the data used for targeting.

        You can use Google and Facebook’s Ads Manager sites yourself and see exactly what advertisers see.

        On the other hand, Apple mostly keep their collected data for their own ad network. Yes, they have one - it’s mostly just used for ads for “recommended” apps in the app store, but last I heard, they have plans to expand it.

    • Corgana
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      The only thing I’m aware of that they do even remotely better than anyone else is privacy.

      Where did you hear this? Its my understanding that they are one of the worst when it comes to privacy.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      They just settled Siri snoop case for a fee pennies…

      “Privacy”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      04 months ago

      They do better about privacy because they make enough money from their inflated prices and blind brand loyalty where they dont have to become an ad company like google. Google is very good at protecting their users data from third parties, as long as they can still collect all of it.

      Apple (currently) doesn’t collect a lot of data which allows them to design products with security as a primary component instead of as an afterthought

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        They collect everything. Every detail of your usage. They may not sell it, but your entire life is on an apple server

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -24 months ago

      Like I said, they’re the least shitty. Can you think of a corp that’s better? Google? Fucking Meta? Microsoft?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Microsoft didn’t spend multiple decades trying to force their own chargers and ports over universal standards. Not saying any of them are good, but apple is in no way better and has spent years creating contention between consumers. It’s just as likely they sell your tracking data as anyone else, they spend developer time every month making sure their ecosystem is considered better for cultural reasons while being ostensibly worse than competitors for most things. Their phones are generally a year or more behind competitors but they have made-up features that serve no purpose consumers rally around like imessage. They have a tiny sandbox to play in without completely voiding your warranty - Themes instead of real customization. “Blue bubbles”? Are you kidding me? How about allowing any form of tinkering beyond a garden path? How about supporting repair of devices at their actual branded stores? They’re easily up there as one of the worst for consumers at large.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I’m really not interested in a long, drawn out debate about this, suffice to say that if you think all the things you listed, most of which are your opinion rather than indisputable fact, somehow make Apple worse than Google, Microsoft, or Meta … well let’s just agree to disagree.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 months ago

            The things he listed aren’t opinion lol, they’re proven facts.

            Why don’t we just say that all these mega corps are evil, period?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        At least with android devices there is a possibility of swapping the operating system and windows computers can always be made Linux.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        I have my own problems with them, but off the top of my head I think the following tech companies all do better than Apple: Red Hat, Canonical, Framework, Purism, System76, Fairphone.

  • Schwim Dandy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24 months ago

    It’s less than .05% of his worth. It’s like us dropping pocket change in the Red Cross bucket and he’ll make more than that in profit from changes the bribe paid for from the great cheetoh.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    Why does such a thing as an inaugural fund exist? Seems like it’s just to facilitate more corruption!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      It doesn’t usually. The ‘why’ in the case is because Trump and his team refuse to sign the ethics agreement to get the normal funding from the government.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        Thanks, it must be amazing for Americans to have a president who won’t sign a standard ethics agreement.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      04 months ago

      Do you know how formalized boycott by everyone in country is called? A ban. Time to ban it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -14 months ago

        Sure let’s start a witch hunt banning people and companies who don’t align with our unique individual politics. What could go wrong?

  • fox2263
    link
    fedilink
    English
    04 months ago

    They’re all “donating” the same amount.

    And also this is the largest inaugural fund in history. In comparison to his previous which was $107m this is so far over $150m.

    Considering Bidens and both of Obamas were between $50m and $70m is this not ringing alarm bells with anyone? Or is this something to “look” in to in like 7 years time when no one gives a shit.

    Beggars belief.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      This is how things are going to work going forward.

      Even if it is illegal, these people are above the law. Internet just exposing obvious corruption.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        Yeah but it did do cool shit and pretended to be unique…

        People now see them what they are, another parasite leeching on the working people