On their official website!

  • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Probably TOR.

    I hear I2P had a lot of potential, but also a lot of issues. Haven’t checked up on that project in a bit. I know it was a BITCH to set up when I tried plinking with it some years ago.

    So TOR (despite the latency/speed issues and its own security concerns) is still probably about as good as it gets.

      • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Completely agree.

        Kinda get the vibe that guy I’m replying to is asking for the times when its actually needed. If I’ve got the wrong mark there and they’re looking for daily driving, then Mullvad VPN (or comparable) is probably the better way to go.

        • Badabinski@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, Mullvad seems to have done the most to prove that they’re not harvesting your data. You still have to trust them, but there’s evidence that they’re trying.

    • WIPocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yea, i2p is slightly more involved than just starting up tor browser, but its not that bad. The real problem for this case is that it doesnt have exit nodes built into the protocol, so getting to the internet is a bit harder.