• fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    157
    ·
    1 year ago

    Turning everything you use into a fucking ads platform is peak capitalism. Burn it with fire.

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      everything you use own

      Consumer already paid for the damn vehicle. At least market that ad-bullshit as the cheaper freemium rental version and offer a no ads purchase version… They are not at all thinking about the consumer, only about filling their ever growing pockets.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need laws on how intrusive ads are allowed to be. Advertising is out of control. Personally, whenever I see an ad too many times, I make sure to avoid purchasing that item or anything from that company. You’re trying too hard to sell me junk.

        • Shudders. Shutters are what people used to have in the US to get through the storms. People thought they were cool so a trend spread. Now almost every house has fake ones. Look on the sides of your windows from outside, ever wonder why that shit was screwed in beside the windows?

        • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cigarette advertising was banned in the US. It famously increased profit because they didn’t have to burn it all on advertising.

          Advertising is like nuclear weapons. It’s bad that it exists, harms people around it, and is only needed because the opposition has it. If it disappeared, everyone would benefit, but no one wants to be the first.

          • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Cigarettes don’t need advertising though to stay on your mind, nicotine does a pretty good job of that. I agree with you for things people need, or are addicted to, but there are a lot of things that need advertising to keep there growth.

            Like car insurance is a necessity and a fixed market, you aren’t going to buy more insurance or buy it more frequently, so their advertising is mostly to maintain their current market position. If the insurance companies all stopped advertising, their profits would probably go up. But cars you can get people to buy more expensive cars more often and expand the market if you advertise to the people enough and convince them to upgrade. If all the car companies stopped advertising, then people wouldn’t see the need to upgrade unless their car is broken, so there would be fewer car sales, and the market would shrink.

            The enemy of this infinite growth scheme called capitalism is satisfaction. If you don’t have a product like cigarettes that generate dissatisfaction from their absence, then you need to create that dissatisfaction with advertising.

      • laranis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok, honest question: In a world where all advertising is banned, how do I know who makes something I want/need?

        Like, is a website you find in a search result an ad? Is putting something in your local Yellow Pages an ad?

        Maybe we need to qualify “No advertising” with something?

        • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. If you are actively searching for something, and go to a specific place that sells that thing. It is not advertising, the active party is you not them.

          The problem is when the active party is the ad-networks, the trackers, the junk pushers.

          If I go to a review site, for say lawn mowers, and they say hey brand 1 is great, but brand 2 is better because of ‘reasons’; I am active, engaging in the process. If however, I then go to a site that is about tigers, and brand 3 pushes their ad to intrude on the tiger info…this (in my opinion) is a major intrusion into my private space.

          • laranis@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Would you ban television commercials? Sponsored products unrelated to a YouTube video’s content?

            I completely agree with you. So tired of pushed garbage ads. There’s just a gray area so the language of a hypothetical “law” would have to carefully considered.

            • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Television ads are a grey area, they don’t tend to track you and follow you around in a creepy way.

              Sponsored content, is in my opinion very similar to TV ads, the sponsor is the same for all viewer of the vid in a similar way to TV.

              • tal@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They didn’t track before the introduction of cable boxes with phone-home capabilities, at any rate.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, dishonest question 😜: In a world where all prostitution is banned, how do I know who will fuck me?

          Like, is a website you find in a search result prostitution? Is putting something in the personals section an ad?

          Maybe we need to qualify “No prostitution” with something?

          /s

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      “how intrusive” ?

      We need laws to ban any sort of tracking, profile generation, etc.

      Bring back contextual ads. If I’m on a gaming website show me a gaming ad ffs.

    • UltraHamster64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      True. Also we need to regulated the spaces that the ads can occupie. Or the possibility that “sky is a billboard” might happen becomes too high

    • Nounka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. Also if the add is : giving an horrible child candy / do they think i am stupid talking / ‘real’ examples

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d take it back and demand a full refund. This is a dangerous, irresponsible product that does not fulfil the purpose it was marketed for.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        How do you prove any of those points for a return? Presumably they don’t show anything while in motion and it does drive so how does it not fulfill its purpose?

        Instead, you can return it in 6 months when the engine is blown because it’s a piece of Stellantis garbage.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Merely driving from a to b is not the only purpose. They’ve sold it as being able to safely navigate, control your media, etc. If they were upfront and said “you cannot safely update your navigation or play/pause media while at lights, because we show ads”, they’d be in the clear. But by the accounts I’ve heard, it seems they didn’t tell people ahead of time what they were buying.

        • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Safety isn’t a thing that only happens when in motion. Checking your surroundings when stopped so you know when to go is important.

          But he’ll, I think video billboards should be banned too.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      yep, the good thing about capitalism is we can now watch the capital pivot away from jeep 😃

  • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can deal with ad when watching TV or YouTube. But ads in the car, even while stopped, is just begging for someone to get killed. Will never even consider getting a jeep. I’m probably gonna have to get a new car in a couple of years and I want something new, but dumb. I want as little smart shit as possible, which is probably not going to be a thing.

    • bearboiblake [he/him]@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can deal with ad when watching TV or YouTube.

      i can’t! i really hate ads, they’re so loud and obnoxious, they’re like jump scares every time they come on! ugh! this car would be like my idea of a nightmare!

      • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use ad breaks in vids to answer texts/emails or take a piss or whatever. Intrusive ads that take up entire pages on a site are the worst tho. Those can fuck off.

          • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just tune ads out. I got ADHD, so it’s really easy for me to get distracted and completely tune things out. It’s useful in some situations, but mostly sucks lmao.

        • MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a good example, considering its Ferrari/Lamborghini maintenance costs, to compare with Volkswagen’s Mercedes/BMW maintenance/repair costs.

            • MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not saying they are bland boxes on wheels, I’m saying the company leadership is bullshit and goes in the wrong directions and the products they make are horrible and not mechanically sound

    • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. Designing in a feature that presents users with something that’s deliberately designed to be as distracting and attention grabbing as possible during a time when they should have their undivided attention on driving is asking for trouble.

      On that note, LED billboards run up along the side of roads should be illegal and at very least have dimmers to prevent them from blinding drivers at night.

  • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It ain’t right.

    But i also don’t get why people are still buying Jeeps? Most cursory search while doing research for a new vehicle should bring up red flags quick.

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The best thing about Saint Luigi is that one doesn’t have to endorse an incel eco-fascist like Teddy K to call for “direct action.”

      • kalpol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It really makes me sad, jeeps used to be awesome till Chrysler started getting bought out, around 2000. It was like when the AMC 4.0 and the Chrysler 318 went, so went Jeep.

        Yes, they are inefficient, and slow, that’s not the point, you could offroad in a ZJ with 250k miles on it and be ok.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      With the opposition he’s facing in the EU, no matter how safe it’ll be (lol), it’ll never be introduced.

  • the_q@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just buy an old Japanese Honda or Toyota and keep it running forever. No one needs a “new” cat at this point.

    Edit: car not cat but leaving it for lols.

  • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Somewhat related to how bad it is at that company right now:

    Yesterday my brother and I drove by a brand new Jeep Wrangler (had a new car plate) that looked like a 24 or 25 that was burnt to the ground from the engine (my guess as the burning was much worse there than the cabin.) Emergency services were there still putting water on the engine bay but the ambulances were already gone. Hopefully everyone is okay.