• TylerBourbon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So who wants to help me Digg the grave for Reddit? /s

    Sort of sad to see another online home fall but nothing lasts forever.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Luigi is a hero.

    See how easy that is when you aren’t given the table scraps of the rich?

  • angleangel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A Reddit spokesperson, who requested that The Verge not use their name due to the sensitive subject matter

    What the fuck is this? We’re granting corporate spokespeople anonymity now?

        • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Was this corporate spokesperson authorized to talk to this outlet about this topic? Just because they’re a spokesperson doesn’t mean they can talk freely.

        • subignition@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even though it’s a corporate spokesperson, they wouldn’t have requested anonymity if they were allowed to talk about it…

          • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Untrue. Reddit employees doing what their bosses tell them to are justifiably afraid of the blowback. Reminds me of the directive to not wear Reddit branding with the 3rd party app thing These folks don’t want targets on their back.

          • multiplewolves@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Take the link and scroll down to the section titled “ON BACKGROUND”

            Edit: I never learn how to not try to be helpful to hostile commenters. I’m legit just trying to clarify or explain.

            I tried to help someone who prefaced their confusion with an assertion that they were unwilling to read the linked material. This one’s on me, I guess.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I still don’t get it. Nothing there says a spokesperson is not a source. Which is good because saying such a thing would make absolutely no sense.

              I’m legit just trying to clarify or explain.

              Don’t know what makes you label me as “hostile”, I’m legit just trying to understand.

              they were unwilling to read the linked material

              It’s like 12 paragraphs of non-sense. The person who looked it up and shared the link could just as easily have copied and shared the relevant portion.

              • multiplewolves@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                A corporate spokesperson spoke to them “on background”. A “corporate communications professional speaking to [them] in [their] official capacity“ has the option detailed in that section to request anonymity while being quoted.

                There must have been an agreement between The Verge and the corporate representative to speak without being identified beyond their affiliation with the company, as described In the section titled “on background”.

  • Upgrayedd1776@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was banned for warning people i would punch them if they upvoted violent content and to knock it off. If spez doesnt want my help then he can go back to his personally moderated kiddy porn subreddits

  • pinheadednightmare@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m actually so happy to see the start of the fall of Reddit. It’s been going on for a couple years or so, but it is happening.

    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s so ironic how a site with a leftist lean just chose to alienate their core base. I guess their hope conservatives and liberals staying will make up for it? Lol

      • Bzdalderon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Leftist lean is a bit of an understatement. It’s not just Reddit. In general, the radical left is being recognized for the violence and chaos they’ve spread over the last decade and the government is realizing they were left unchecked for too long.

        Now they’re just being treated the same as the radical right.

        • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d not be dismayed to see a bit of violence and chaos from the radical left but I’m struggling to think of examples - do you have some?

        • pogmommy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah man the radical left’s crazy violent agenda like… Free healthcare, and decent standards of living? No wait I mean the erosion of systems of inequality fuck wait no I mean uh labor rights and empowree workers wait shit no

          I’m starting to think the radical let’s crazy agenda is actually far less violent than the status quo

        • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As a centrist, I don’t see the radical left being courted by the president, so I think your comment is presenting a bit of a false equivalence, champ.

          • Bzdalderon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m a centrist too…

            It’s crazy that a pendulum swings drastically back and forth isn’t it? Not a false equivalency if you have any understanding of historical geopolitics.

            If you marginalize and de-platform an entire half of your voter base, and cancel people for taking a centrist stance, they’re more likely to band together against your cause, doing more harm long term than if you just toed a rational line.

            IE. Because the right were treated the way the left are now being treated for so long, they were polarized and radicalized to the result of who your president is now.

            Also, not American, this isn’t just an American thing. This is happening globally.

              • Bzdalderon@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Here is a great example of the “if you’re not with us you’re against us” mentality: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/may/28/centrism-insidious-bias-unjust-status-quo

                Reasonable views being cancelled:

                Bari Weiss: A former opinion editor and writer at The New York Times, Weiss is known for her centrist views, often critiquing both the far-left and far-right. In July 2020, she resigned from the newspaper, citing a hostile work environment and alleging that her centrist stances led to bullying by colleagues. ​

                Example of extremes people will go to silence the moderates…

                Stefan Gelbhaar: A member of Germany’s Green Party, Gelbhaar, associated with the party’s more centrist “Realo” wing, was forced to withdraw from the federal election race following false sexual harassment allegations. An investigation later revealed that the accusations came from a fictitious persona created by a local Green official, leading to internal tensions within the party.

                • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  As a German I’m very familiar with the Gelbhaar case actually and it doesn’t have the slightest thing to do with centrism. It actually ended with the person pushing the fake accusations having to leave the party, but you knew that already.

                  I’ll look into the others when I’m home later.

  • ComeHereOrIHookYou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why stop there? If I where reddit and we go with these kinds of decisions, I’d propose the use of LLMs to ban anything that consititutes negative statement including disagreements.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The guy stomps on innocent, unsuspecting little turtles and occasionally burns them alive. Of course it should be flagged.

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Spez is a loser with only millions, compared to his billionaire tech bros. This is the main reason he started ruining reddit in the past years, he is frustrated and wants to also become a billionaire like his buddies

  • Intergalactic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    People saying Luigi is a hero but then defend the Democrats. Truly astonishing. Luigi’s actions are a call to systemic revolution. He is a god damn hero, and will probably go down as a martyr if the federal government gets their way.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Democrats aren’t perfect but we’d be in 92% better shape with one in the Whitehouse right now.

      • Intergalactic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We? Who is we? The working class would still be exploited. We’d just have a President who is “nicer” about it. We need a revolution, because reform is damn near impossible now.