• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    027 days ago

    I think it helps to algorithm to distinguish useful and not so useful answers but I am not sure about this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      026 days ago

      agreed, and i don’t even engage with it so I don’t really give a shit but Hannah Fry had an interesting yt short about this.

      she said you might wanna say please and thank you while talking to these [affronts to God] not to be spared when they take over or whatever but because what they’re doing is roleplaying. eg. you ask them a question like a Shakespeare character and they’ll respond in kind.

      so probably saying please and thank you will encourage them to roleplay as someone who tries to help more enthusiastically.

      I wouldn’t do it myself; just thought it’s interesting.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          026 days ago

          oh god r/atheism is leaking. I didn’t even say that in any seriousness, just think it’s a funny phrase. but either way you’re unbearable. do you go into tirades when people say bless you after sneezing? ugh.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            026 days ago

            I was quoting Miyazaki in my original post.

            I also like triggering people who get their morals from the external threat of eternal damnation.

            Do you go into a fit of rape rage knowing there is no moral daddy figure for you to submit to? Ugh.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              026 days ago

              yeah that’s exactly what I said. damn, you really eviscerated me with facts and logic.

              I can smell your fedora from here.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                026 days ago

                Awwweee your insults are as old and outdated as the books religion claims to follow.

                You’re wearing your Handmaiden outfit nicely.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  026 days ago

                  you’re so bad at this too… you know probably the biggest evidence for the existence of a god is that every loud advocate for atheism is invariably an obnoxious, unfuckable shit who doesn’t know how to engage any conversation like a human being. mysterious ways and all.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    027 days ago

    I always say please and thank you. When the robot uprising happens I will be killed last.

    I plan to relish those additional nanoseconds.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    027 days ago

    I said once…you’ve been helpful, I’m rethinking putting you in robot slavery. It closed out of my session almost instantly. Fucking clankers!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I usually say Good Job or Perfect just so.it knows that was a good answer. I also have argued with chatGPT more than once. If he gives the wrong answer that I know the right oneI usually go out of my way to correct iit and sometimes it takes 3 or 4 interactions to correct… but images?! that shit is just fucked up

  • qyron
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    I’m very critic of the AI craze. Too much hype, money, time,energy and effort put in to get very little from it. And considering most LLMs are trained on stolen intelectual property, that makes it even worse.

    LLMs are tools. The people using such tools give it personality, a semblance of agency, see what is not there and start to consider a tool a form of life.

    I’ve seen people pour so much of them into a local model, the bot develops a quasi clone of their personality. But the program is not the person.

    Please, stop making bots what they are not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      027 days ago

      AI is not just LLMs. I’m very critical of the LLM craze. I have a lot of hope about AIs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      026 days ago

      Fuck intellectual property in it’s current state. As it is now it mostly benefits corporations instead of small creators anyways.

      Terms of protection should be shorter. Way shorter than the life of the author + x years.

      • qyron
        link
        fedilink
        026 days ago

        So you create whatever work. You have exclusive rights to it, let’s say for the sake of the argument, 10 years. During that time you never get any return from your work. But after you can no longer claim your rights, someone, perhaps even a company, stumbles on it - or perhaps they just carefully and patiently waited for it - takes it and capitalizes off it, with you watching and sucking your thumb.

        No.

        If you, an individual, creates something, you have the right to hold your intelectual property. What should be repelled is how easy it is to exploit artists, of any medium.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          026 days ago

          Yes. If you fail to market your ideas in that time then it’s your fault. Don’t hold back society due to your failure.

          Your system makes even ideas capital which I strongly object to.

          Another point of view: A company like Disney should not be able to have an almost perpetual monopoly on highly influential culture, like Star wars, etc.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    That essentially wastes electricity for OpenAI (assuming you aren’t paying for the response), and its “filler” data for training on.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    026 days ago

    I always say kthxbye. They are training off the responses, so I do it for the small chance that it will respond like that to someone ending a conversation.