Summary

Marcy Rheintgen, a 20-year-old transgender college student, was arrested at the Florida State Capitol after intentionally entering a women’s restroom in protest of the state’s transgender bathroom law.

Civil rights lawyers say it is the first known arrest under such laws in any U.S. state.

Rheintgen faces a misdemeanor trespassing charge and could face up to 60 days in jail.

Florida is one of only two states to criminalize such acts.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      020 days ago

      How is that fascist?

      Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived

      What you are, is uneducated

      • Suite404
        link
        fedilink
        020 days ago

        I think they’re talking about oppressing trans people, not about a woman using the woman’s bathroom.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      020 days ago

      “When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.” – Franklin Leonard

  • Rymrgand's Daughter
    link
    fedilink
    020 days ago

    Considering the other places with bathroom bills had cis women attacked by cops…

    Honestly I hope they can figure something out for her, Marcy will not survive 60 days in prison

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      020 days ago

      She shouldn’t have to, and I hope she is safe, but I also wouldn’t underestimate what Marcy is capable of surviving. But, Imagine all the good she would be bringing into the world if we didn’t force her to spend her time doing this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    020 days ago

    Transfolk are absolutely their next big target after they’re finished removing the immigrants.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    021 days ago

    They stopped that woman from peeing in a toilet.

    Good job. The children are safe.

    From her.

    Not from school shooters tho. They are still in terrible danger from them.

    But at least they won’t have to deal with that woman using the wrong bathroom.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      020 days ago

      Also not safe from being assaulted by a Republican politician in a women’s bathroom, which has happened tons more than by trans women - especially since there’s no recorded incidents of a trans woman assaulting anybody in a women’s bathroom and the group behind the claim openly said that they made it up in an interview 15 years ago.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      021 days ago

      Well it’s illegal to shoot up schools too but people still do it. I guess laws really don’t matter anymore.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Bathroom laws are unenforceable and largely function instead like: “conform as closely as possible to gendered expectations of appearance and presentation or get the shit kicked out of you”.

    This mostly affects cis women. Having broad shoulders and short hair is all it takes really. The more these laws are promoted, the more cis women who don’t conform to social body standards for women will suffer. Wearing a skirt and growing your hair long and wearing makeup every single day could legitimately become a matter of your own safety.

    Biological gender essentialism is just gender roles all over again. They’ve packaged it as a way to force trans people out of society, and it does for anyone who can’t go stealth. But far more than it affects trans people, it affects cis people. They know that. That’s actually the point in the first place. They want to socially enforce patriarchy. The goal is to force women to submit to men and male scrutiny of their gender.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      020 days ago

      Short hair, yup. Short thick curly hair, hat, unique voice… Once spoke with someone for an hour and was shocked when their friend the bartender gendered them.

      They might’ve been conservative too who even knows. Super important point I hope* someone popular and wealthy relays to the US president frequently. “Nobody wants creeps in the bathroom Mr. President but my mom has broad shoulders…”

      (*Hopefully at +13hr after I’m safe from someone taking my hope in a reply)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      020 days ago

      Wearing a skirt and growing your hair long and wearing makeup every single day could legitimately become a matter of your own safety.

      Damn. I hate how spot on this sounds.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    020 days ago

    What you people fail to realize is that this will fix the economy, once all trans people are in jail everything is going to be fucking dandy, no more overpriced eggs, no more wagestealing, no more corruption…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Bathrooms just need to be single person use. Then neither side could complain. Who wants to go to the bathroom with other people anyway?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      020 days ago

      Seriously this. I’ve been to other places that have it figured out (Sweden in my case) and it is better in every possible way.

      Well, unless you are a landlord who wants the up-front construction costs of the restrooms to be as cheap as possible regardless of how it will affect the decades of use. Or if you live in a country with no healthcare and can’t let people have privacy in the restroom because you’re afraid they’ll OD in there.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      020 days ago

      I got a food truck bazaar near me with only one bathroom with a placard that shows the typical man/woman then a half half, and an alien reading. " Whatever, just wash your hands."

      Best break down I’ve ever seen on this dumb ass debate.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      019 days ago

      not every location is capable of supporting single user bathrooms. im pretty pro-unisex bathroom anyway

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        019 days ago

        If only there was some kind of “stall” they could put in that would allow multiple people to be in the same restroom and maintain their privacy…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        019 days ago

        Um, you just add a door to the bathroom if it doesn’t have one. Then you put a lock on it, and a new sign. Very easy to do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      020 days ago

      Some of it is just based on logistics. A sports venue for example would have a hard time converting their bathrooms to gender neutral, and the reality is that “men’s rooms” can be more space efficient due the focus on urinals.

      But I find it completely ridiculous when a restaurant has two single occupancy bathrooms, one marked men and one marked women.

      • acargitz
        link
        fedilink
        020 days ago

        That’s not the logistical nightmare you make it out to be.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          020 days ago

          Not a nightmare, no, but it’s definitely a problem that needs solving. As it is you have lines out both doors. If you open both bathrooms to either gender you significantly decrease the efficiency of the “men’s room” since you’re going to have a line of people who can’t use urinals stopping people from getting to the urinals.

          You could design facilities to make it work, but our current facilities would be significantly less efficient.

          • acargitz
            link
            fedilink
            020 days ago

            I’m sure there are civil engineers out there who can figure this out. Not worth sacrificing anyone’s rights or safety for it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              019 days ago

              I’m presenting a perfectly valid issue and your answer is to cover your ears and say someone else will figure it out.

              • acargitz
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                I’m not saying it’s not a valid issue. I’m saying it’s not an important issue. Different things.

                To make it a bit more clear: every technology embodies values, and accepts different kinds of inconveniences or efficiencies as acceptable. For example, the GDPR accepts the nuisance of making everyone accept cookies on every website as acceptable, because data privacy is ranked as more important than that particular nuisance. The ADA makes engineers put ramps everywhere. Annoying to some, useful to others, but the value of accessibility trumps whatever nuisance is cased by the ramps.

                Rank your values. What is more important: safety and inclusivity or pee lines? And if you accept the former as a priority, then you can ask, how to best minimize the nuisance of the pee lines without compromising the other more important value. If you value small pee lines as more important than safety and inclusivity, you do the opposite. So there. That’s what I mean about “important”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    019 days ago

    Trans activists are going about this all wrong. Instead of sending someone like Marcy in to violate the law, they need to do this:

    Send in the biggest, burliest, hairiest ftm trans dudes into busy ladies rooms, the room that the state insists he must now legally use. And record the reaction of the women and girls leaving for broadcast media. Because by focussing on mtf trans in ladies rooms, I really feel the dipshits that make these laws haven’t thought their cunning plans through very fully.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Send in the biggest, burliest, hairiest ftm trans dudes into busy ladies rooms, the room that the state insists he must now legally use.

      I mean, that’s what we’ve functionally done. The distinction is that the biggest, burliest, hairiest dude isn’t ftm trans, he’s a fucking cop.

      In an exclusive interview with The Advocate, Morton detailed the humiliating and distressing encounter. She said that she had entered the restroom with her ex-girlfriend, who handed her a tampon, when two male deputies stormed in, shining flashlights into the stall and demanding she exit. Morton, still using the toilet, was stunned.

      “They were flashing lights on our feet and saying, ‘You have to get out of here. You have to come out. We need to talk to you,’” Morton said. “I’m telling them, ‘I’m still using the restroom. I’m sitting down, I’m peeing. What is the issue?’”

      When she finally exited the stall, she said she lifted her shirt to prove she was not a man, expecting the ordeal to end. Instead, she said one deputy continued to question her appearance, insisting she “looked like a man.” Morton started recording, later posting a 9-second clip to TikTok, where it has since been viewed more than 3.7 million times. “They came in here in the girls’ restroom because I’m a girl and they didn’t think I was a girl, so they tried to come take me away,” she says in the video.

      Like, this is the fucking future. The problem is that - outside of specifically LGBTQ media like The Advocate - it gets virtually no press. Cops terrorizing women in the restroom and demanding that they prove they aren’t Transgender just aren’t something the deeply conservative and heavily Trump-pilled local media oligarchs want appearing on TV.

      You get stories like OP’s instead, specifically because they do feed into the “Men are trying to sneak into the women’s room to attack your daughter/wife/girlfriend”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Idk if its any fairer to send trans men in. Plus a pretty girl garners more sympathy.

      Realistically trying to make them enforce them with genital inspections is the only thing that will make the public think about the ramifications

      Edit: I’m not going to advocate saying this but I think the funniest take would be to say gender restricted bathrooms are part of the gay agenda and if girls and boys can use the same restroom at home they can use them in public.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        019 days ago

        You gotta understand that they don’t see a pretty girl. What they see is a freak, a pervert, or in my moms words “a demon from the pits of hell”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    019 days ago

    Someone needs to start printing up massive numbers of posters with that picture of her face and in large bold lettering: “ARRESTED FOR ENTERING A WOMEN’S RESTROOM”

    Plaster that shit all over the state. Let people see just how ridiculous and cruel the law is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      019 days ago

      “He was posing as a women for years, just so he could get into ladies rooms to rape our beautiful MAGA women!” -MAGA Nazis.

      Why does he need to “pose” as a woman to do that? Every rapist I’ve ever heard of was able to practice their hobby without going trans.

  • greenfire
    link
    fedilink
    English
    021 days ago

    Segregated bathrooms were done away with by the civil rights laws of the 1960’s

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    021 days ago

    I’ve said this before but I really want to hear some stories of trans men using the womens bathroom in these places. Big muscular men with bald heads and beards, barging in pissing everywhere and leaving toilet seats up.

    I want to see the meltdown when people find out they’re just following the law. Please trans bros do this for me.

    • Match!!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      021 days ago

      Call your friends up for a posse when you do!!

  • AugustWest
    link
    fedilink
    English
    020 days ago

    You know they have no actual reason for this law aside from intimidation, threat, and leverage for the weak minds who need something to be mad at.

    If anyone really cared, they would just make the hand-washing area open, and private stalls for people to do their business. No need to have Mens/Womens. Many places I have been to do this, and it just works.

    But then again, there really is not a problem to solve, and the “solution” is removing trans people from society and has nothing to do with bathrooms.