• شاهد على إبادة
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    She served in the Israeli occupation forces. Would you watch a movie with a Russian actor who served in the military?

    Israel is guilty of genocide, and illegally occupies Palestinian, Syrian and Lebanese lands. The movie should be banned in more than just Lebanon.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 days ago

    I bet she just can’t wait for her beach front property built on the bones and blood of dead Palestinian children. I personally boycott her (and many others) movies, but banning a movie no body asked for, nor wanted is giving it more hype than it’s do.

  • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 days ago

    The Gal Gadot hype in the 2010’s was always overdone. Reviews of Wonder Woman at the time noted her lack of acting skills and that the same lack of skills made it hard to take that Justice League movie seriously.

    Rhea Ripley should have been Wonder Woman. Then again, she got lucky by avoiding that good awful anti-communist sequel.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 days ago

    Can’t have our population exposed to contradicting opinions to ours right?! Born in a country?! Banned!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      In case anyone has any doubts this is just a troll arguing in bad faith, and just a terrible human in general (explains why they defend genocide):

      Edit: Btw, this message is illegal in many countries of the EU. Any admin that comes across this may want to keep logs of this user and do a total ban, as I will be reporting them to the authorities.

      Examples: in Germany, Section 217 of the Penal Code criminalizes the promotion of suicide for profit. In France, Article 223-13 of the Penal Code states that “the fact of inciting someone to commit suicide” is punishable by law.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 days ago

        How long do you think the planet should have boycotted American citizens after the President Truman approved 2 nuclear bomb attacks on civilian cities to scare the Japanese emperor into capitulation?

        A couple years? Zero boycott? Cuz its the USA and you always have the best end result in mind, so it justifies the means?

        Israelis retaliation against Gaza has killed around 100k at the highest estimates…. how many Iraqi citizens and children were killed from 2002-2022? More than 100k?

        if so, does that make Americans more genocidal and colonistic? if they killed more people for a foreign invasion thousands of miles from the USA?

        or was it all okay cuz 9/11?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 days ago

          I don’t live in the USA, and boycott them too.

          Either way, your argument is a strawman, because Israel is still actively committing genocide, and there’s multiple sources of evidence of Netanyahu also funding Hamas. It’s also incredibly unlikely one of the world’s top surveillance tech states, that was able to do a supply chain attack via beepers, was also blind sided by what happened October 7th.

          And lastly, USA wasn’t seeking to colonize Iraq or even your disingenuous comparison to WW2 Japan - Israel has been building illegal settlements on the other hand for years.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 days ago

            US was seeking to make Iraq a stable US-friendly regime.

            i cannot understand possibly what in your brain is telling you they weren‘t. thats identical to israels intent with gaza. identical.

            talking blindsided terror attacks justifying wars, what about 9/11 warning? US engaged in a 20+ yr occupation, genocide, etc causing DIRECTLY over 2 million civilians dead and displaced.

            why do you give the US a pass? and crucify israel over 100k dead?

            what literally is the difference to you? why are you not online being anti-USA? they killed at minimum over 10x more civilians after 9/11

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 days ago

              Literally am anti USA to the point I left long ago, and have avoided US products as much as possible since before it was popular due to Trump.

              However, again, the Iraq war has ended, and the USA was literally not sending Americans to permanently live in Iraq while killing every Iraqi possible.

              Israel’s intent with Gaza is to wipe out Palestinians in Gaza entirely and make Gaza part of Israel.

              And lastly, this whole argument is a strawman because this post was about Gal Gadot. But good try at derailment, troll. It failed this time so I guess you’ll get a pay deduction from Netanyahu. Or at least, I’d hope you weren’t so stupid to be doing this for free.

              Either way, you’re a despicable human for trying to excuse genocide in any way, including whataboutism, and part of why humanity cannot advance further as a species. I can only hope you feel shame at yourself, for only through that would you have any redemption.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          They either have the choice of deferring and spending 1-2 months in jail, or serving and committing crimes against humanity.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Did she commit any crimes against humanity then?

            You know that’s a very serious accusation right?

            Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 days ago

              The institution she was a part of did.

              Extraordinary horror like genocide require extraordinary measure.

              Ya know, like (gasp) censoring a shitty Disney movie lmao

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              As far as I can tell when she served she only helped train the troops who were committing the war crimes on-the-ground.

              She’s also been steadfast in her support for Israel, promoting the propaganda about the mass systematic rapes by Hamas on Oct 7th which no evidence of has come to light in over a year. While also having nothing to say about the systemic torture and rapes of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons, which include the torture and sexual assault of Palestinian children, and silence about the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. She served the IDF for 2 years and is still a steadfast supporter. That shows she is aware of the war crimes the IDF commits and supports them. Otherwise she would be on Breaking the Silence.

              https://forward.com/culture/film-tv/706699/gal-gadot-snow-white-israeli-palestinian-conflict/

              Her going on actual raids in Lebanon or piloting the bombs or air strikes is not a requirement for people to boycott or Lebanon to ban the movie.

              If people in the 1930-40s boycotted a movie featuring a soldier that served in Nazi Germany (because of the acts of Nazi Germany), despite that soldier not seeing action, that would be just as justified. Especially if that soldier still supported Nazi Germany.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 days ago

      Israel has been bombing Lebanon. This doesn’t seem like an issue of difference of opinions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 days ago

        How long do you think the planet should have boycotted American citizens after the President Truman approved 2 nuclear bomb attacks on civilian cities to scare the Japanese emperor into capitulation?

        A couple years? Zero boycott? Cuz its the USA and you always have the best end result in mind, so it justifies the means?

        Israelis retaliation against Gaza has killed around 100k at the highest estimates…. how many Iraqi citizens and children were killed from 2002-2022? More than 100k?

        if so, does that make Americans more genocidal and colonistic? if they killed more people for a foreign invasion thousands of miles from the USA?

        or was it all okay cuz 9/11?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 days ago

        So no movies with anyone jewish or israeli?

        Like americans sending japanese to camps, do you really think this is the appropriate target for people protesting the Israeli rightwing majority party?

        i think its odd to ban jewish products and people due to the actions of a government body they are not a member of and have zero impact on.

        its like being pissed at german bakers for hitlers policies in world war 2.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 days ago

            or what about boycotting americans for their causing almost every problem we face today?

            their election of bush… leads to over 2 million civilians dead and displaced in Iraq, which led to the Syrian war (multi millions dead), migration crises in europe, talking tens of millions of human lives destroyed.

            due to americans voting to elect a guy they wanted to have a beer with (george w).

            should we ban your citizens? because you cause almost every single issue being dealt with today on earth.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 days ago

            I mean should the world ban Americans due to many of them voting to elect Trump? Its cool with all Israelis too? Don‘t come back with the „she served in the military“ when its a requirement for citizenship in Israel, as it is in Austria where I live.

            If she supports right wing Netanyahu policies of displacing palestinians, then yes, ban her.

            If she has nothing to do with israeli policies other than her place of birth…well i dont understand you in any way.

            I dont blame individuals for the actions of their shit leaders unless they actively are supporting those shit leaders and those actions.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 days ago

              I mean should the world ban Americans due to many of them voting to elect Trump?

              European here. I would support a travel ban for Americans.

              You can still ask for asylum

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          Ww2 or the Japanese internment camps, aren’t currently happening right now and continuing to happen. If they were they’d elicit the same reaction and actions. That makes you a contributor to what’s happening if you fund it, or patronize it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 days ago

            yeah but you did cause the entire middle eastern scenario we see today. USA invades iraq and overthrows saddam, killing around a million civilians and displacing around 2 million more.

            your country. not israel.

            the power vaccuum leads to syrian civil war and isis.

            we‘re talking millions dead due to USA policies.

            so who should countries be banning? Gal Gadot from Israel?

            Or you, from the USA?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          Is it at all like that? Or is it like sanctioning a country for its crimes, like sanctions on Russia for the Ukraine invasion?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 days ago

            Should the world sanction the US for its CIA destablizing nations across tje globe for the past 80 years? What about the deaths and displacement of millions of Iraqi citizens post 9/11 (that had something to do with Iraq, right?)

            Do you really think, as an AMERICAN, the world should start punishing citizens abroad for their leaders actions? Whether or not they support them or have anything to do with their nations decision-making apparatus?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 days ago

        They also banned Schindler’s List.

        It is a difference of opinion. About whether or not Jews should exist.

    • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Only gay liberal women watch gal gadot, I am afraid you won’t be enoying the marriage for long now

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 days ago

    While I have no interest in this movie and I think Gal Godot sucks, banning movies is akin to banning books.

    • adr1an
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 days ago

      There’s a huge difference between the reasons for such a ban. This wasn’t a movie with political content antagonist to Lebanon government. This ban is probably to make a statement for both outside and inside the country. To show how normalized the violence against them is widespread in our media industry. But you can read in this action whatever you like… Sure…

      Ps. Have you seen Waltz with Bashir? Hell of an animated movie.

    • huf [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 days ago

      it’s a remake of gal gadot and it has disney in it, it’s absolutely the best idea to ban it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 days ago

        Banning books, like banning movies, is a great way to admit publicly that your position is so weak you can’t tolerate any dissent. Let the power of your ideals stand on their own.

        • Upvoting for the edit. It’s rare to see people doing self crit and changing their position after having it explained to them why their initial position is wrong. I wish I saw it more often. rat-salute

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          Except in this case, the thing being banned has no message they’re trying to repress. They’re targeting a person who’s in it.

        • Nakoichi [they/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          Yeah sure just debate Nazis in the fReE mArKeTpLaCe Of IdEaS! I’m gonna end it there because what I have to say is much less civil.

        • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          How about we don’t let Disney try to profit off a movie starring a Zionist in a country that just got invaded by the Zionist Entity?

          Do you think the abstract concept of dissent is the only reason to censor something? Because be clear here, the film isn’t proposing dissent in Lebanon. It’s slop made for a quick bit of money to go on Disney’s big pile of money, and it stars a war criminal who worked for an agency that likes to kill Lebanese people . Yeah Gal Gadot dissents against the idea that Lebanon shouldn’t be sent exploding pagers

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 days ago

            Yeah I guess ban and boycott mean different things to me, but you’re right. Functionally this is a boycott and I support boycotting this movie. Fair point.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          Let the power of your ideals stand on their own.

          “Fascism will die in the marketplace of ideas” has been conclusively disproven.

          This is not because fascism is a strong idea, it’s because the marketplace of ideas (like most markets) ranges from “doesn’t work very well” to “rigged.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 days ago

            Lol fascism got into power because there is a revolutionary mood in the air and the capitalists have spent a century banning the idea of socialism at every turn. I feel very confident that socialism would have become popular if there wasn’t an active effort to stymie it’s adoption by the masses.

            So yes the marketplace of ideas is rigged.

        • anarchoilluminati [comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          You think Lebanon’s position against being invaded by Zionists and having their innocent civilians and children bombed to death is weak because they banned a movie?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 days ago

            Their position against being invaded is weak because they spent twenty years failing to keep Hezbollah from attacking Israel which is why they got invaded.

            • dkr567 [comrade/them, he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Except that Hezbollah formed due to the invasion by Israelis in 1982 but I get it, you liberals refuse to open a history book for once in your lives.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                03 days ago

                No. Because most people would agree that attacking someone means you can’t complain when you get attacked.

                • DoiDoi [comrade/them, he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  So incredibly stupid lmao

                  Israel has been a genocidal apartheid state inflicting unfathomable misery on the region for like 80 years and is currently indiscriminately bombing thousands of civilians in Lebanon as part of their genocidal ambitions. Damn wonder where all this animosity comes from.

                  You fought back! Now you can’t complain about genocide!

        • Rom [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          So a blanket ban of any books that acknowledge the existence of LGBTQ+ people and banning a single Disney movie for having a war criminal lead actress are exactly the same thing to you? You really can’t tell the difference?

            • Rom [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 days ago

              Do you think Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal? What about Joe Biden or Donald Trump?

            • Coolkidbozzy [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 days ago

              she is one of the strongest supporters of the Wehrmacht and their ongoing genocide, even after enthusiastically serving in it

              also I’ve heard she’s an awful actor (not that I would know, I don’t watch capeshit). She’s bombed box offices across the planet

                • anarchoilluminati [comrade/them]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Was Adolf Hitler convicted for the Holocaust?

                  Were slave owners in the US convicted for crimes against humanity?

                  If they weren’t, then I am powerless to do anything but defend their innocence. I am very smart.

        • huf [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          first they came for the disney remakes starring war criminals or whatever, and there was no one left to speak

        • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          I need you to understand that Mein Kampf is a banned book and so you are currently claiming the case against literal NSDAP Nazism is so weak it can’t tolerate dissent.

          You need to either do some self crit and disentangle yourself from liberal idealism or get the fuck out of here.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 days ago

            Mein Kampf actually isn’t banned in the US or most of the world. It’s banned in Germany for obvious reasons.

            • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 days ago

              Why are you repeating what I just told you as if you’re contradicting me? Mein Kampf is banned, and not because of any weakness in the case against it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            What? Mein Kampf is not banned almost anywhere in the world barring few exceptions mostly regulating it’s copyright or printing new copies.