• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    022 hours ago

    How about some of that socialism for the rest of us, and not just for breeders and soybean farmers?

    • Steve Dice
      link
      fedilink
      English
      022 hours ago

      Paying desperate people to produce corpo slaves is the furthest thing from socialism.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        019 hours ago

        I was being a bit facetious, but yeah. It’s a pretty transparent ploy to get the birth rate up for as little money as possible. God forbid line doesn’t go up always and forever, for all eternity.

  • wuphysics87
    link
    fedilink
    01 day ago

    Why would this in particular be important to him? I would think he wouldn’t care

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      020 hours ago

      Guess, in no particular order, could be all these or none of these:

      Someone told him about runaway population decline now being taken seriously in SK and Japan, we’re not quite in the unrecoverable zone yet. https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20250404-south-korea-is-over

      5000/child is enough to get a rural wageslave to bolster their numbers and create the next generation of right-wing voters, but not enough to get left-wing educated people who can make reasonable guesses 9 months into the future.

      5000 per child is cheap and it’s enough to gain him popularity where he’s just starting to weaken.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      023 hours ago

      Evangelicals are a big part of his base and hate that there aren’t more children in their sunday schools.

  • JackbyDev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 day ago

    I feel like that’s more than $5k in the picture if they’re all $20 bills.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      019 hours ago

      Yeah, I counted at least 50 stacks of $20 bills. Usually those stacks are 100 bills each, so over $100k in that pic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      020 hours ago

      Those stacks aren’t 100 dollars each that’s for sure… More like 1000… I count at least 47 stacks… So let’s round to 50…

      Yeah that’s 50k, which is definitely more than 5k

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    01 day ago

    $5,000 is a lot to those braindead morons who insist that “nobody wants to work” because they’re still living comfortably off of a few $1,400 checks from half a decade ago…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      021 hours ago

      I get your ribbing. But it’s sad if people think they saved anything.

      They literally mathematically added way more debt and cut gap.

      Yeah we don’t need govt workers…who contribute to tax base. Nah…

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 days ago

    What are the odds this is just Clinton’s $5,000 Baby Bond, which was just giving them a fund at birth that they can cash out when they turn 18?

    Except this time there’s no guardrails and he can give it to all his cryptobro friends.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Adoption services are going to go wild! Hospitals too with infant detox programs. It’s the new plasma!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      02 days ago

      Babies expensive, yo.

      Not just diapers, but formula is expensive, as is wipes, clothes, all the shit you need for them really.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      02 days ago

      I could see that, we went through a lot of diapers with my kid. Clothes pile up between 4m and 8m especially because the size fluctuations between manufacturers.

      How much did you spend the first year?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 days ago

      Napkin math. A box of Huggies size 1 diapers sells at 10.50 for 32 diapers, or roughly 30 cents each. My newborn spoiled a diaper about 7 to 8 times a day on average, it let’s easy say 2.50 a day, 356 days or about 912 dollars in diapers for the first year.

      That doesn’t count wipes, powder, up sizes as they grow. I suppose you could go premier diapers as well, but yeah there’s probably an easy 3000 gap on clothes

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        02 days ago

        Don’t forget medical visits and one other thing… Hmmm, what was it again that almost half of children born end up needing again? Oh yeah, baby formula.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    02 days ago

    Daycare is free where I live. It has to be. You can’t expect people to pay for public services themselves; that’s done with taxes. Corporations can’t have customers or employees without people, and to get people to make more people, you have to make it easier for them. So what makes the most sense is cutting corporation porfits, which they don’t need past a limit if they aren’t investing in things that will benefit the public. So if a corporation isn’t doing anything good, raise their taxes, use them to pay for daycare.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      020 hours ago

      60 years ago, wages were sufficient that one partner could be a homemaker even if the other only had a modest job, and they could afford a house and a car. We’ve only needed daycare as wages have stagnated against the cost of living.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 days ago

    Trade:

    • One person’s wages

    For:

    • Mortgage payments on a reasonably sized house
    • All bills
    • Food for two adults plus children
    • Entertainment

    Then you might see more babies.

    It was their greed that caused this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 days ago

      I was surprised that bands of 20s could add up, but then I remember how you can fit a million dollars in a suitcase with 100s lol

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 days ago

      You mean, they’re using irrelevant and unrelated content in the message for shock value?

      Impossible.