Nationality/time period doesnt matter

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 day ago

    Clarence Darrow, known for his defense in the Scopes “Monkey” trial, and more recently, Alan Dershowitz and Johnny Cochran.

    Incidentally, the transcript from the Scopes trial is awesome. There is a book about the trial called “Trial of the Century” and it quotes from the transcripts heavily, a great read.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      28 hours ago

      Alan Dershowitz has turned into a right-wing hack, making ridiculous legal arguments to defend untenable positions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 hours ago

        He lost the case in that particular court but he won in the broader court of public opinion. The real loser was Wlliams Jenning Bryan.

  • Owl
    link
    fedilink
    222 days ago

    Why do you want to know ? DOESN’T MATTER ! JUST CALL SAUL GOODMAN RIGHT NOW !

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 days ago

    Probably, the only defense lawyer most people could name off the top of their head is Johnnie Cochran.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 day ago

      Yeah he’s certainly the most famous modern defense lawyer. He got a guy who very obviously murdered someone off through his skills as a lawyer so that sticks in people’s minds. For the young people in this thread, he was OJ Simpson’s lawyer.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I have a feeling, just based on how law works, that this will be highly subjective. I interpret your question as being about skill. If that’s not what you mean please correct me. (Sorry for the non-answer)

    Even within criminal law, things like acquittal rate would very with the exact kind of practice - a guy that specialises in complex white-collar crime and takes easy cases might get a really good one without too much skill. Someone who takes anybody who will pay upfront will probably have a cruddy one. This could get even more extreme if you look at non-Western or historical systems where the result is almost guaranteed in advance. So, that’s not in the spirit of the question.

    I seem to remember an XKCD What If where Randall Munroe mentions the highest paid (criminal?) attorney in the US, but there again, it was someone who sounded highly connected. Does that correspond to skill? (Edit: The late Ted Olson, who does appear to have defended criminal cases)

    Somebody that actually knows a lot of names and legal history might be able to tell you something more useful, but just take it with a grain of salt.