• crawancon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    not a person of color to be seen for miles and miles of this fucking picture. until later when these pale pink fucks are turned loose against anyone not them.

    easily led shit bird white christian dog shit eating idiots allowed this while swearing they’d never allow it to happen.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Holy fucking shit… 1000$ for an asylum claim? And 3500$ for children. This is monstrous. I am an immigrant and naturalized citizen to Canada and I never had to pay that much legal fees for immigration and citizenship.

    • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Everything he does can be grounds for impeachment, but if the republicans control all branches of government even if impeached (he was impeached 3 times last time) they will never remove him from office.

      EDIT: Y’all notice a common pattern on all those “peace officers” on the picture?

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve written this multiple times in the last few months. I’ll keep doing it because people need to get the message: There isn’t going to be an impeachment, and even if there were, it would fail.

      The impeachment process requires cooperation from both houses of congress. A simple majority in the house of representatives must vote to approve articles of impeachment. Then the Senate decides what to do with them. They can hold a trial or they can just vote. Conviction requires a 2/3 majority of the Senate. This is why both attempts to impeach Trump previously already failed. The Senate Republicans simply moved to an immediate vote and killed it.

      Now, consider that Republicans currently hold a majority in both houses. THERE WILL BE NO IMPEACHMENT barring a major upset in the midterm elections. Even then it is almost guaranteed to fail. Impeachment is not going to save us.

      • ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I dunno about you, but I wanna see how many impeachments Trump can rack up before he leaves office/dies. I’m hoping for at least triple digits.

        • peregrin5@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That would just prove that we have no real consequences for breaking our laws if you’re the president and that impeachments are toothless.

            • peregrin5@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s good to know the suffering of American citizens is your preferred form of entertainment.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        i think everyone realises that there will be no impeachment, but it’s useful to point out that any single 1 of these acts SHOULD result in impeachment and that it’s REPUBLICANS as a whole that are betraying their role in the system; not ONLY a single man

  • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    A second order further militarizes local police departments, while providing legal resources to officers accused of abuses; it also seeks to undo federal consent decrees for departments that have committed civil rights abuses and seeks to punish local officials who “unlawfully prohibit law enforcement officers from carrying out duties.”

    That’s not militarization, it’s promoting lawlessness and removing any remaining accountability.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Have you not wondered why they keep trying to get the military involved? It’s because they think the military is above the law and can just shoot anyone and do what they want.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Seattle PD literally had to be partially taken over by the federal government because it was so corrupt and would not curb its officers… this is going to be VERY problematic in Seattle and surrounding areas.

      • thallamabond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        By definition the federal government will return Seattle PD back into what it was, but with federal backing and technical support.

        I’m in a smaller city and even our local PD has two apcs. This is a nightmare.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          In all honesty if they have to APCs then they have one APC maybe half an APC, those things are designed with military logistics in mind so their parts are easy to replace if not particularly robust.

  • Zess@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    A third executive order requires professional truck drivers to be proficient in English.

    Higher requirements than the office of president.

  • JesusSon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I have a buddy who told me this was awesome. This same buddy dog walked Clinton’s crime bill from sea to shining sea back in the 90s. Are they stupid or is it me? Anyway I pointed out the similarities and he got mad at me.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you don’t have a gun, it’s time to get one and learn how to use it.

    …also how to carry safely. Don’t be that guy.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Including when to use it. It is a last resort. If you pull a gun on any law enforcement officer, even if fully justified, you will be going to jail at best, and killed on the spot at worst.

      • laranis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        This is the part I have a hard time with. I want to defend myself and my family, but pulling a weapon on authorities means you’re gonna die. These ICE/militarized PDs aren’t going to pause a second if they get any excuse to put you down. They might not even bother with the paperwork at this point.

        Unless we’re in a “take as many of them with you when you go” situation. But that’s a different conversation than the “organize and call your lawyer” advice I’m seeing in this thread.

        • pulido@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          So like, it pretty much always makes more sense to flee than to fight.

          Guns should be seen as a last resort, not a first.

        • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          believe it or not, you’re just as capable of killing them as they are you. train and have confidence. confidence and discipline.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      My great-grandfather was there on D-Day.

      A good portion of his descendants are hard Trump supporters and are pro-nationalism and pro-fascism.

      Glad he’s not around to see his family literally turn and support the very things he fought against.

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’ve been further educated by the “internet” and now believe they had the wrong allies.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Oh we all have.

      Remember skinheads and how they aren’t seen anymore?

      Ok so well You know how sometimes you see those white guys who are incels and get SUPER DUPER into WWII history and then pop out later saying they think hitler ‘had his reasons’ to do what he was doing and start rationalizing genocide because the world ‘isn’t fair to white guys anymore’.

      and they have a fascination to end woke cuz they think that’s what took all their privilege over everyone else away. They see being educated about WWII being bad as being ‘woke’. And this all used to be the 12-15 yr olds playing 1942.

      Yeah… so they infiltrated the conservative parties in all western countries right now and fighting to bring back facism. Conservatives you’ll notice is a conglomerate now and it’s rife with infighting because you have the old school conservatives that never went this way and it’s been flushed in with these scary beings they don’t want to piss off. That party would decimate if either side leaves too cuz they’d never have this win over the liberals should they divide again. So they are at odds with each other : pwn libs at the cost of constitution or certain demise?

      You’ll notice There is a distinct homogeneousness to the conservatives in all countries right now too.

      It just so happens to be on the heels of propaganda fake overs on global social platforms such as x and Facebook. Which just so happens to be the exact CEOs that showed up to the inauguration.

  • lsibilla@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I thought for a moment he invited the village people to the White House….