• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The governors have to allow it. The federal government cannot mobilize the military in a state unless the governor of that state allows it. Posse Comitatus, if Trump attempts to send in the military against the governors wishes, we are talking civil war levels of federal vs state’s rights. I hope state militias are ready to defend themselves.

    • jimjam5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Knowing Texas, Abbott will roll out the red carpet for this. Maybe I need to move to California or Illinois to get a governor that won’t bend over.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What consequences for breaking the laws that enforce rules like those have have been applied so far to this administration?

      • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        ICE would have to battle the governor’s security. ICE doesn’t have the stones to go up against people who aren’t essentially terrified and helpless.

    • DarthKaren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      We’ll see what happens with the new yes men in place. However, there was a DoD wide email that went out when he first started snatching people (though some didn’t get it for some reason). It stated:

      Think long and hard before assisting other agencies outside the DoD. If your actions are deemed to be against your oath, you could be investigated and actions taken against you. Remember, you serve the constitution of the United States. Not the president.

      Wa state has just passed a law stating that other state’s national guard, cannot enter our borders to take any actions. I would bet that that would include military personnel stationed in state.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you don’t have a gun, it’s time to get one and learn how to use it.

    …also how to carry safely. Don’t be that guy.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Including when to use it. It is a last resort. If you pull a gun on any law enforcement officer, even if fully justified, you will be going to jail at best, and killed on the spot at worst.

      • laranis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This is the part I have a hard time with. I want to defend myself and my family, but pulling a weapon on authorities means you’re gonna die. These ICE/militarized PDs aren’t going to pause a second if they get any excuse to put you down. They might not even bother with the paperwork at this point.

        Unless we’re in a “take as many of them with you when you go” situation. But that’s a different conversation than the “organize and call your lawyer” advice I’m seeing in this thread.

        • pulido@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          So like, it pretty much always makes more sense to flee than to fight.

          Guns should be seen as a last resort, not a first.

        • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          believe it or not, you’re just as capable of killing them as they are you. train and have confidence. confidence and discipline.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My great-grandfather was there on D-Day.

      A good portion of his descendants are hard Trump supporters and are pro-nationalism and pro-fascism.

      Glad he’s not around to see his family literally turn and support the very things he fought against.

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’ve been further educated by the “internet” and now believe they had the wrong allies.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Oh we all have.

      Remember skinheads and how they aren’t seen anymore?

      Ok so well You know how sometimes you see those white guys who are incels and get SUPER DUPER into WWII history and then pop out later saying they think hitler ‘had his reasons’ to do what he was doing and start rationalizing genocide because the world ‘isn’t fair to white guys anymore’.

      and they have a fascination to end woke cuz they think that’s what took all their privilege over everyone else away. They see being educated about WWII being bad as being ‘woke’. And this all used to be the 12-15 yr olds playing 1942.

      Yeah… so they infiltrated the conservative parties in all western countries right now and fighting to bring back facism. Conservatives you’ll notice is a conglomerate now and it’s rife with infighting because you have the old school conservatives that never went this way and it’s been flushed in with these scary beings they don’t want to piss off. That party would decimate if either side leaves too cuz they’d never have this win over the liberals should they divide again. So they are at odds with each other : pwn libs at the cost of constitution or certain demise?

      You’ll notice There is a distinct homogeneousness to the conservatives in all countries right now too.

      It just so happens to be on the heels of propaganda fake overs on global social platforms such as x and Facebook. Which just so happens to be the exact CEOs that showed up to the inauguration.

  • lsibilla@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I thought for a moment he invited the village people to the White House….

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Militarize the police

    It wasn’t yet? US police has fucking tanks and mraps, it is already militarized, just without the training and restraint

  • Hellsfire29@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The afghan refugees can fuck off. Only the terps should have been allowed refuge. And they have to be checked.

    Police already have swat teams. Maybe if people obey the law, they won’t have to worry about MRAPs rolling down their streets.

    Maybe the civilians should have those tools instead. Cause the citizens are supposed to keep the government in check, not the other way around.

    But the left wing citizens are right. We should depend on the government for our safety and provide us with goods and services. They’d never lie to us. Burning down establishments and destroying property will show the right wing citizens to have different beliefs!!

  • pulido@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Never vote for another fucking establishment democrat ever again.

    They always fucking lie and say they can’t do anything, then a republican comes into office and does EVERYTHING.

    Fuck everyone who voted against Bernie in the primaries.

    • brammis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Upset with Democrats for following the rules and blame them when Republicans break the law? We want all parties to follow the rules, not more politicians commiting crime to get their way.

      • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Rules? The democrats talk about having their hands tied and they can’t do shit, and only float ideas around. Ideas that never materialize. The Republicans then claim the dems are dictators and do as they please and all the chaos is from their ideas that were never implemented. You know the green new deal and defund the police? Nothing of the green new deal ever happened, but the Republicans acted as if everything was fully enact. And police funding actually soared during their administrations, but Republicans act like all police forces were gutted (remember the cowardly police action at Uvalde? They claim it was the police defunding that caused it when the Uvalde PD’s funding was never touched).

        I sometimes wished we lived in the fantasy world Republican propagandists say we live in. If we did, ironically none of the fascists we see online or on TV would be around since they would all be conveniently ‘disappeared’.

        • brammis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because most (not all) of the Democrats are trying to govern, but most (not all) of the Republicans are trying to take advantage of the system.

          The problem (as I see it) is that more money is being poured into the Republican party from many angles. They have reinforced think tanks, special interest groups, media platforms, billionaires, etc where they profiteer off of winning. The Democrats have some of that, but woefully behind.

  • crawancon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    not a person of color to be seen for miles and miles of this fucking picture. until later when these pale pink fucks are turned loose against anyone not them.

    easily led shit bird white christian dog shit eating idiots allowed this while swearing they’d never allow it to happen.

  • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    A second order further militarizes local police departments, while providing legal resources to officers accused of abuses; it also seeks to undo federal consent decrees for departments that have committed civil rights abuses and seeks to punish local officials who “unlawfully prohibit law enforcement officers from carrying out duties.”

    That’s not militarization, it’s promoting lawlessness and removing any remaining accountability.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Have you not wondered why they keep trying to get the military involved? It’s because they think the military is above the law and can just shoot anyone and do what they want.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seattle PD literally had to be partially taken over by the federal government because it was so corrupt and would not curb its officers… this is going to be VERY problematic in Seattle and surrounding areas.

      • thallamabond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        By definition the federal government will return Seattle PD back into what it was, but with federal backing and technical support.

        I’m in a smaller city and even our local PD has two apcs. This is a nightmare.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          In all honesty if they have to APCs then they have one APC maybe half an APC, those things are designed with military logistics in mind so their parts are easy to replace if not particularly robust.