There are the 3 considered outcomes for the universe - continued expansion, reaching a static astrophysical plane or gravitational collapse. No matter the outcome, if there is a standing wave the length (why would you have 1.5 times or anything other than 1 !?) Then under the expansion, statis and contraction scenarios, only one of these would ever reach stasis, all other scenarios have a standing wave in flux.

In ATR FTIR (attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy) evanescent waves penetrate outside the medium to complete the Quantisation rule. Would the same occur if we did try produce a 1.2 times wave?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    There are the 3 considered outcomes for the universe - continued expansion, reaching a static astrophysical plane or gravitational collapse.

    Nah. There’s a shit ton more.

    Penrose has been saying for a while it’s more like that Katy Perry song Fireworks…

    Just big bangs happening all over, than fading out or crossing boundaries to others. Until they “bump” into ours, we would have no way to detect them due to us and them constantly expanding.

    That’s not even getting into more and more proof that our universe exists in a black hole, and there is no way of knowing what position of nested universes we’re in. Our black holes could contain a universe that contains a black hole containing another universe…

    And it can go infinitely in the other direction as well.