Just around 24 hours after Musk made his comments, more than 42,000 new users joined Bluesky, making it the biggest signup day yet for the currently invite-only platform that launched earlier this year.

Bluesky saw a total of 53,585 new signups by the end of Tuesday, September 19. The new users gained in that single day make up 5 percent of the platform’s entire user base of 1,125,499 total accounts.

The new user signups are tracked via the third-party website “Bluesky Stats.” Looking over Bluesky signup numbers on the tracker for the past month, it appears that the platform usually sees from 10,000 to 20,000 new signups per day. Bluesky has doubled its usual daily new user numbers already, with many more hours left in the day still to go.

It’s impossible to know whether Musk’s comments about charging users to post on X really played a role in this, but it almost certainly had some effect.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        masto is fractured even further with different servers arguing in places (a bit like here tbh) over federation.

        And? Servers are inter-operable.

        • IMALlama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Until your home instance defederates from another instance. Sure, you can always make another account, but your average user wants a lower friction experience.

          I’m reasonably active in the fediverse, but I recognize that the more explaining it takes to the average user the less likely they’re going to want to join in.

          The old old top gear cool wall tried to hit on this concept. You could have a very technically excellent car classified as uncool because if you had to explain why it was cool to a normie you had already lost them.

          It will be hard for the fediverse to get over this hump, which is probably why you see so many Linux users here and so few say woodworkers or other (somewhat) more niche communities.

  • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Great another social media platform from the same fart huffing dumb asses that sold Twitter… it’s like people don’t learn lessons.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      FYI jack isn’t in control of the site and in fact even deleted his account after the userbase mocked him hard enough, he’s all in on nostr now

      Also it has federation in testing in a sandbox environment open to external developers, it will work similarly to Mastodon in that regard

      • DrQuint@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        “Mr Dorsey, ypur new platform is picking up, people are starting to use it”

        “… I’m bored”

        “Excuse me?”

        “I don’t want to have a social platform. I just want to make them” *Starts to leave*

        “Mr. dorsey? Where are you going? Jack!?”

      • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I love that I mentioned fart huffing and you automatically assumed I meant Jack.

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      I learned today that you’d have to be confined in a small room with approximately a year’s worth of farts before you risk asphyxiation.

  • uis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is a problem. Bluesky is privately-owned and will do same shit.

    Here are some explainations. And more.

    • realharo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s also controlled by another crypto shill, so it has that in common with Twitter too.

  • drdalek13@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I firmly believe Elon is trying to run Twitter out of relevancy, or business entirely.

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree but I don’t understand why. What motivated him to sink 1/4th of his net worth into Twitter then kill it?

      • LUHG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        Knowing this nutter he’s probably doing it so people can’t talk about the crappy Tesla QC.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago
        1. The jet tracker

        2. Twitter is a huge place where leftists organize

        3. Probably wants to pull a reddit and push Trump

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago
          1. I wouldn’t say that. It was filled with far-right and some people who like others to suffer and bring to suicide indie game developers.
          • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s also used by fascists but there have been a lot of genuine leftist organizing going down deep in the cracks of that hellsite.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      If that were true, the investors who paid him billions for the take over will want his head on a spike.

      • baked_tea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you’d know who these investors are, you’d know running twitter to ground is their goal at this point as well

          • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            The theory is they’re not trying to make money, but is trying to make it harder to use Twitter for organizing protests or share ideas that threaten their status quo.

        • CaptainAniki@lemmy.flight-crew.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          The saudis have more money than god. They could have just bought it and shuttered it if they wanted to. Your schlock makes no sense.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Plausible deniability, combined with opportunism. If they brought it, and shut it down, it would be painfully obvious. This could cause significant problems or pushback on them. Musk being an idiot provided an opportunity to them. They back musk, and he makes it non viable, however he wants. All the public outrage gets focused onto musk (who likes the attention).

            I still can’t decide between the 2 options. Either musk is just THAT big of an idiot, or if it’s the result of some backroom deal. Both seem feasible.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Glad cracker musk is losing money over this, I just wish people wouldn’t just jump into the next boiling pot because the current one got too hot.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Medium is a bad source but there’s truth that Bluesky’s CEO is a musk toesucker.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Twitter was dead long before another billionaire bought it, you just didn’t listen to gamers.

        • Ejh3k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Twitter died when they decided to tweak your timeline so it wasn’t chronological. I deleted my account back in 2013 because of that shit.

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Users who already have accounts on Bluesky get access codes they can give out to others over time. You don’t even need to open the app to earn access codes. You just need an account.

          Basically, as the devs let more and more people in, the platform will experience exponential growth. If the devs let in one person, that one person can let in 5 more in just 2 months time, and those 5 can let in 5 more each, and so on.

          • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Why the hell Bluesky is still invite only is beyond me. They killed their hype during the most important time, during multiple Twitter exoduses. People wanted to swap to it but couldn’t. They were so desperate that Threads got 100m users really quick, just because people so badly wanted a Twitter alternative. Invite only doesn’t even provide any benefit.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Bluesky, the “decentralized” X-alternative social media platform

    “The” alternative platform?? Shots fired.

    • atyaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Serious question, why would you consider Bluesky? I would argue that mastodon is “the” decentralized social media platform, I mean it’s not owned by some billionaire; and if you mostly care about audience size, nothing beats twitter. I’ve never felt any inclination to try bluesky for these reasons.

  • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Strange to measure it against an invite only site, I would love to sign up but I haven’t been able to find invites. I think between Mastodon, Bluesky & Threads via ActivityPub (eventually) will get most of my communities back.

    I love Mastodon & prefer it in many ways but there just aren’t enough people there. The tech & dev community is lively, everything else is essentially non-existent.

    • geosoco@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s a convenience article. They’re just reporting some number they have access to.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      And why Threads instead of Mastodon if you belive it will use ActivityPub.

      The tech & dev community is lively, everything else is essentially non-existent.

      Broners are pretty active there. Biggest instance is equestria.social, some people use or run smaller instances, some use GP instances.

    • DrVortex@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      You are right. In principle, the AT protocol is designed for federation. But at the moment, there is only one Bluesky instance that everyone is signing up on. This makes it effectively centralized like Twitter. It is mind-boggling that people are ignoring Mastodon for this.