NRS refuses to enter into an agreement with Ancestry.com, saying it would lose 3.7 million pounds in revenue if the records became available on the website

  • actionjbone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    This isn’t about opening records for the public.

    It’s about Ancestry, the company, increasing its data pool and training AI systems.

    • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fuck ancestry! When they started charging people to access the very data that they ‘allowed’ them to enter free, they lost all credibility in my eyes.

      • Pacrat173@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        It makes doing anything a pain. I’m lucky enough to have access to ancestry access at my local library but I despise their company and practices. Their prices are insane and they lock people out of this hobby.

  • Microw@piefed.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I personally prefer archives to offer access to records for free (like most of the church archives do in Austria), but I’d rather see an archive charge a small fee for the access than Ancestry.com fucking that archive over.