A high degree of transparency is necessary for a “company owned by humanity” to be managed by the public. When such a company hires people or serves customers, how can their right to privacy be protected? How should sensitive information and company secrets be handled?
A related question is whether chat groups that deal with company matters should be public and readable by everyone. On the one hand, transparency is good because this company is supposed to belong to everyone in the world, and therefore everyone should have the opportunity to follow the company’s affairs. On the other hand, those who participate in a public chat group expose themselves. Sometimes it is better for people to have a protected environment in which they can express themselves freely without strangers being able to access what they have written.
Perhaps a hybrid solution would be appropriate where there are several chat groups, some of which are public and others only used by closed groups within the community. I would favor such a decentralized approach where there is no central chat group for all participants, but rather people organize themselves into smaller groups.
It would probably be necessary to make certain information within the company accessible only to a small group of people who undertake to treat this knowledge confidentially. Perhaps it would make sense to have these people elected by the community. However, it must of course be ensured that these people are trustworthy.