mimiclem.me
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Palestine@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 days ago

Understanding the relationship between Zionism and Fascism

mondoweiss.net

external-link
message-square
19
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
8
external-link

Understanding the relationship between Zionism and Fascism

mondoweiss.net

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Palestine@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 days ago
message-square
19
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
Despite the mutual admiration between Zionists and fascists, they are usually seen as separate political movements. However, when viewed through the lens of Western racism, colonialism, and imperialism, the connections become clear.
  • Farhad@freefree.ps
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    @yogthos

    I did a lot of research for a book “3 ideologies that shaped the 20th century” about “Fascism, Communism and Zionism” the 3 ideologies that was created at the same time, in central/eastern europe.

    All 3 based on superiority of a group above others, 2 were crushed by the world and Zionism is now the only remaining extremist ideology that is killing innocent people while destroying our freedom and rights.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Communism is very much not based on the idea of superiority of a group above others.

      • Farhad@freefree.ps
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        @yogthos

        well, it is the dictatorship of proletariat was the foundation of the disasters that followed in Russia, China, Cambodja and other places.

        Sure, the idea was noble, but it created an atmosphere of hate, discrimination and mass murder.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          What are you even talking about here? Standard of living rapidly increased in every communist country compared to before. Having actually lived in USSR, I can tell you for a fact that there was no atmosphere of hate or discrimination. Maybe learn some actual history instead of guzzling propaganda.

          After the revolution, Russia went from a backwards agrarian society where people travelled by horse and carriage to being the first in space in the span of 40 years. Russia showed incredible growth after the revolution that surpassed the rest of the world:

          • https://wid.world/document/soviets-oligarchs-inequality-property-russia-1905-2016/
          • https://wid.world/document/appendix-soviets-oligarchs-inequality-property-russia-1905-2016-wid-world-working-paper-201710/

          USSR provided free education to all citizens resulting in literacy rising from 33% to 99.9%:

          • http://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/archive/PubEdUSSR.htm
          • http://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/archive/anglosov.htm
          • http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0000/000013/001300eo.pdf
          • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Likbez

          USSR doubled life expectancy in just 20 years. A newborn child in 1926-27 had a life expectancy of 44.4 years, up from 32.3 years thirty years before. In 1958-59 the life expectancy for newborns went up to 68.6 years. the Semashko system of the USSR increased lifespan by 50% in 20 years. By the 1960’s, lifespans in the USSR were comparable to those in the USA:

          • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Soviet_Union
          • https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB5054/index1.html

          USSR ended famines https://artir.wordpress.com/2017/02/04

          Quality of nutrition improved after the Soviet revolution, and the last time USSR had a famine was in 1940s. CIA data suggests they ate just as much as Americans after WW2 peroid while having better nutrition:

          • https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp84b00274r000300150009-5

          USSR moved from 58.5-hour work weeks to 41.6 hour work weeks (-0.36 h/yr) between 1913 and 1960:

          • https://books.google.com/books?id=x8JYjwEACAAJ
          • https://web.archive.org/web/20210509140019/https://b-ok.cc/book/2669908/77497f

          USSR averaged 22 days of paid leave in 1986 while USA averaged 7.6 in 1996:

          • https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1994/94B09_66_englp2.pdf

          • https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ebs.t05.htm

          • Had the 2nd fastest growing economy of the 20th century after Japan. The USSR started out at the same level of economic development and population as Brazil in 1920, which makes comparisons to the US, an already industrialized country by the 1920s, even more spectacular.

          • Free Universal Health care, and most doctors per capita in the world.](https://www.marxists.org/archive/newsholme/1933/red-medicine/index.htm) 42 doctors per 10k population, vs 24 in Denmark and Sweden, 19 in US.

          • Had near zero unemployment, continuous economic growth for 70 straight years. The “continuous” part should make sense – the USSR was a planned, non-market economy, so market crashes á la capitalism were pretty much impossible.

          In 1987, people in the USSR could retire with pension at 55 (female) and 60 (male) while receiving 50% of their wages at a at minimum. Meanwhile, in USA the average retirement age was 62-67 and the average (not median) retiree household in the USA could expect $48k/yr which comes out to 65% of the 74k average (not median) household income in 2016:

          • https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1994/94B09_66_englp2.pdf

          • https://www.cbsnews.com/news/could-you-get-by-on-the-average-americans-retirement-income/

          • All education, including university level, free. 2

          • 99% literacy.

          • Combatted sex inequality. Equal wages for men and women mandated by law, but sex inequality, although not as pronounced as under capitalism, was perpetuated in social roles.

          • Combatted Racial inequality.

          • Soviet power production per capita in 1990 was more than the EU, Great Britain, or China’s in 2014. GDP took off after socialism was established and then collapsed with the reintroduction of capitalism:

          • https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Soviet_Union_GDP_per_capita.gif

          The Soviet Union had the highest physician/patient ratio in the world. USSR had 42 doctors per 10,000 population compared to 24 in Denmark and Sweden, and 19 in US:

          • http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0735675784900482 (use sci-hub for access)

          • USSR defeated a smallpox epidemic in a matter of 19 days https://www.rbth.com/history/331857-how-ussr-defeated-black-smallpox

          • The Social Consequences of Soviet Immunization Policies https://web.archive.org/web/20240218132709/https://www.ucis.pitt.edu/nceeer/1997-812-03g-Hoch.pdf

          Next, we can look at what happened after the USSR collapsed, and what came with capitalist privatization:

          • Life expectancy decreases by 10 years. 2. 7.7 million excess deaths in the first year. 2
          • 40% of population drops into poverty.
          • GDP instantly halves.
          • One in ten children now live on the streets. Infant mortality increases. Was 29.3 in 2003 which is around (current) Syria and Micronesia, 7.9 in 2013. Infant mortality in USSR was 1.92, literally the lowest in the world.
          • 1996 election rigged by the US, Yeltsin sends in tanks to disperse the supreme soviet.

          For an overview of the soviet experiment, watch this brilliant talk by Micheal Parenti, or read his article, Left anticommunism, the unkindest cut.

          Also read this great article by Stephen Gowans, Do publicly owned, planned economies work?. Audio on youtube

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            @[email protected]

            here are some academic studies on USSR

            Professor of Economic History, Robert C. Allen, concludes in his study without the 1917 revolution is directly responsible for rapid growth that made the achievements listed above possible:

            • https://web.archive.org/web/20200119044114/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.507.8966&rep=rep1&type=pdf

            Study demonstrating the steady increase in quality of life during the Soviet period (including under Stalin). Includes the fact that Soviet life expectancy grew faster than any other nation recorded at the time:

            • https://www.jstor.org/stable/2672986?seq=1

            A large study using world bank data analyzing the quality of life in Capitalist vs Socialist countries and finds overwhelmingly at similar levels of development with socialism bringing better quality of life:

            • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1646771/pdf/amjph00269-0055.pdf

            This study compared capitalist and socialist countries in measures of the physical quality of life (PQL), taking into account the level of economic development.

            • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2430906/

            This study shows that unprecedented mortality crisis struck Eastern Europe during the 1990s, causing around 7 million excess deaths. The first quantitative analysis of the association between deindustrialization and mortality in Eastern Europe.

            • https://academic.oup.com/cje/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cje/beac072/7081084?guestAccessKey=01c8dd9f-af1c-48b3-b271-eb5d3a45017c&login=false

            Romania, the inustrialization of an agrarian economy under socialist planning

            • https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/888851468333915517/pdf/multi0page.pdf

            And of course we can look at how do people who lived under communism feel now that they got a taste of capitalism?

            • A remarkable 72% of Hungarians say that most people in their country are actually worse off today economically than they were under communism. Only 8% say most people in Hungary are better off, and 16% say things are about the same. In no other Central or Eastern European country surveyed did so many believe that economic life is worse now than during the communist era. This is the result of almost universal displeasure with the economy. Fully 94% describe the country’s economy as bad, the highest level of economic discontent in the hard hit region of Central and Eastern Europe. Just 46% of Hungarians approve of their country’s switch from a state-controlled economy to a market economy; 42% disapprove of the move away from communism. The public is even more negative toward Hungary’s integration into Europe; 71% say their country has been weakened by the process.

            • The most incredible result was registered in a July 2010 IRES (Romanian Institute for Evaluation and Strategy) poll, according to which 41% of the respondents would have voted for Ceausescu, had he run for the position of president. And 63% of the survey participants said their life was better during communism, while only 23% attested that their life was worse then. Some 68% declared that communism was a good idea, just one that had been poorly applied.

            • Glorification of the German Democratic Republic is on the rise two decades after the Berlin Wall fell. Young people and the better off are among those rebuffing criticism of East Germany as an “illegitimate state.” In a new poll, more than half of former eastern Germans defend the GDR.

            • A poll shows that as many as 81 per cent of Serbians believe they lived best in the former Yugoslavia -“during the time of socialism”. The survey focused on the respondents’ views on the transition “from socialism to capitalism”, and a clear majority said they trusted social institutions the most during the rule of Yugoslav communist president Josip Broz Tito. The standard of living during Tito’s rule from the Second World War to the 1980s was also assessed as best, whereas the Milosevic decade of the 1990s, and the subsequent decade since the fall of his regime are seen as “more or less the same”. 45 percent said they trusted social institutions most under communism with 23 percent choosing the 2001-2003 period when Zoran Djinđic was prime minister. Only 19 per cent selected present-day institutions.

            • 75% of Russians have expressed increasingly positive opinions about the Soviet Union over the years. Only a small portion of those surveyed said they had negative associations with the Soviet Union. The economic deficit, long lines and coupons were named by 4% of respondents each, while the Iron Curtain, economic stagnation and political repressions were named by 1% each, the Levada Center said.

            • Adult mortality increased enormously in Russia and other countries of the former Soviet Union when the Soviet system collapsed 30 years ago. https://archive.ph/9Z12u

            • Former Soviet Countries See More Harm From Breakup https://news.gallup.com/poll/166538/former-soviet-countries-harm-breakup.aspx

            • Farhad@freefree.ps
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              @yogthos

              and does it prove that the system was a success?

              Would you say the same about Israel and it’s economy too?

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 days ago

                I already addressed your false narrative in my other reply. Don’t be so transparently dishonest, it’s not a good look.

          • Farhad@freefree.ps
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            @yogthos oh, quality of life is terrible in israel?

            does it mean it is a good system?

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              You are being incredibly intellectually dishonest here. The sources I provided show that USSR improve the standard of living for the working people. It wasn’t based on exploitation, apartheid or genocide the way the west and israel are. It’s very telling that you’d ignore the facts and stick to your false narrative in face of overwhelming evidence. Do better.

              • Farhad@freefree.ps
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                @yogthos

                again, I said you are right.

                USSR was a great place to live, just like Israel is a great place to live for the jews.

                a successful society can’t live on success of a group while opressing others.

                But again, you believe in what you believe.

                You can call it dishonest, you can’t accept that the horror of Stalin and Mao were result of problems with the political implementation of communism.

                Communism as an ideological economical system is one thing, it’s political implementations

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  You’re a deeply dishonest individual trying to create some sort of an equivalence between an apartheid state of Israel and worker state of USSR. You should be ashamed of yourself. I literally provided you with numerous sources and academic studies showing that you’re full of shit. Yet, here you are again regurgitating the same talking points you’ve memorized instead of actually engaging with the information you’re provided. Go and spew you drivel somewhere else.

                  • Farhad@freefree.ps
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    @yogthos
                    Oh dear.

                    How many times do I need to say yes are right.

                    Just stop it. You are not the owner of internet to tell what I can or cannot say.

                    But I’m sure you are perfectly okay with such behavior

        • lamassu@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          If you’re referring to famine, both Russia and China had experienced it over and over throughout their histories. In both cases, it only took one more before they resolved the problem of food security permanently. Famine continues to exist under the capitalist imperialist system even as we produce a surplus.

          Pol Pot was supported by the CIA. It was the communists in Vietnam who liberated the country from his tyranny.

          • Farhad@freefree.ps
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            @o_d
            JFC you are right.

            Stalin an Mao were great leaders /facepalm

            • lamassu@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              The people of Russia and China certainly agree they were. Your chauvanism is obvious and your arguments are based entirely on vibes. You’re not convincing anyone.

              • Farhad@freefree.ps
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                @o_d

                Seriously, chauvinism?

                That’s one funny one.

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      lol at the idea of fascism being crushed… it’s alive and well and currently resurgent

      • Farhad@freefree.ps
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        @huf

        Fascism is a natural result of capitalism uncontrolled.

        It was crushed in the 1940s, but it returns because the global capitalism evolved into the new fascism we see today.

Palestine@lemmy.ml

palestine@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A community to discuss everything Palestine.

Rules:

  1. Posts can be in Arabic or English.

  2. Please add a flair in the title of every post. Example: “[News] Israel annexes the West Bank ”, “[Culture] Musakhan is the nicest food in the world!”, “[Question] How many Palestinians live in Jordan?”

List of flairs: [News] [Culture] [Discussion] [Question] [Request] [Guide]

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 107 users / day
  • 457 users / week
  • 2.76K users / month
  • 4.19K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 2.38K subscribers
  • 8.02K Posts
  • 9.64K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
  • Felicia@lemmy.ml
  • marmulak@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org