• stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Eh, the age limit should be the same as the general age of pension, and it should only apply for being able to be voted in.

    This means that if you get voted in at 65, than you are able to serve that term, but nothing longer.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 days ago

        I just had a look at the equivalent of the US suppreme court here, “Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen”, and the officers of the court serve until retirement.

        Seems resonable to me.

        • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          It is the same here. But they often decide to “retire” at death, i.e., lifelong tenure.

      • Aljernon@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        I think SC justices should have terms. Make em long terms if you’d like but still limits. And again, no one over 65.