Because he was an (likely intelligence-affiliated) influence broker with a huge social circle. Doesn’t make associating with him less scummy, but it does not mean someone was necessarily a pedophile. Though, statistically speaking, it does dramatically increase that probability.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 10/EFTA01739806.pdf
Your point? Not to detract from her awfulness, but neither of these documents implicate JK Rowling in pedophilia.
At a minimum, pedo apologist.
Why else would anyone interact with that man, if not to support or partake of his evil deeds?
I mean, my name sure as fuck isn’t in there.
Because he was an (likely intelligence-affiliated) influence broker with a huge social circle. Doesn’t make associating with him less scummy, but it does not mean someone was necessarily a pedophile. Though, statistically speaking, it does dramatically increase that probability.
A: “can you introduce me to JK Rowling? Also remember Julie?”
Epstein: “sure I remember Julie”
(͡•_ ͡• )
Where does it say Epstein is friends with JK?