If you haven’t seen this yet, Google is planning to require mandatory developer identity verification for all Android apps, including apps distributed outside the Play Store, taking effect September 2026. This affects every independent and open source Android developer directly.

This is not just about the Play Store. After September 2026, on any certified Android device, applications from unverified developers will be blocked by default. The only proposed bypass, the “advanced flow”, exists only as a blog post and has not appeared in any beta, dev preview, or canary release. No one outside Google has seen it.

The community has been fighting back at keepandroidopen.org:

  • Read the full breakdown of what this means
  • Sign the open letter (organisations only)
  • Contact your national regulators — contacts listed by country on the site
  • Add the countdown banner to your project

September 2026 is closer than it looks. The time to push back is now.

  • Bazell@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is what happens when you don’t have strong competitors. We need to promote more independent OS platforms for smartphones like Linux distros.

      • berg@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Both are important.

        Legal cases create precedents which can be used to fight similar cases in the future.

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          In bizarre legislation systems like the US and the UK if I understand it correctly. I hope the EU will find some non BS thing to do stopping this crap.

          And that graphene os will come to good cheap phones 😬

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Every single time competitor appeared, they were ignored. Blackberry, Symbian, Windows 8/Mobile.

      Microsoft even tried throwing money at app developers to bridge the biggest gap aka apps, but most companies didn’t even want their money, perceiving porting as too troublesome.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        3 days ago

        What? BlackBerry was ignored? BlackBerry existed before Android and iOS. It was Android and iOS that killed BlackBerry.

      • Zagorath@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s actually a shame, because Windows Phone was actually good. It featured a much more user/task-centric UI, letting users think about what they want to do, rather than which app they need to use to do it. Of course, this was bad for apps’ ability to gain and reinforce brand recognition. So of course they didn’t want to support it.

        • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Honestly this, I thought the windows phone was really good. That said I’ll never forgive Microsoft for buying nokia and effectively killing Meego (yes I know sailfish is a thing but it’s pretty stunted growth wise)

        • TarantulaFudge@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          I was a windows phone user and the last Windows version is to blame for killing their phones. They released a half baked platform that literally required SOAP for all network traffic. No raw TCP or UDP access just SOAP… a horrible standard based on XML with like 10x the overhead. 6.1 was probably the best but even that was plagued by compatibility issues.

      • Bazell@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        We are taking about Google. The US tech company that works with the US government(which is rotted to the core now). No matter how noble the reasons they will tell you for this actions, this identity verification will be used for surveillance and control of personal life. This is basically the same thing as with child safety now.