• standarduser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Would love If these shilled news sites wouldn’t use the negative terms like jab, though this is fantastic news

    • timochka@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Huh? The BBC is a UK news site (not really sure what ‘shilled’ means, but anyway.) In the UK “a jab” is perfectly normal and not remotely negative vernacular for getting a vaccination. As in “I’m going to the doctor to get my jabs for my holiday to Timbuctoo” or “damn that scratch is deep, lucky I’ve had my Tetanus jab”, or whatever.

      • standarduser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Since the start of covid it has gotten larger use in negative light stateside. So seeing it I immediately jump to, oh god jabs here we go again with negative vaccination terminology. I wasn’t aware of its use though in UK, that’s good to know. I appreciate the clarity on it

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I’ve never had any negative associations with it. I always assumed it was a common British word like boot or crisps.