Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu flew over Greece, Italy, France and Canada on Thursday on his way to address the UN, despite an International Criminal Court warrant for his arrest.

The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu in November 2024, on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed in Gaza since October 2023.

Netanyahu arrived in the US for a short visit to address the UN General Assembly in New York, where Mayor Zohran Mamdani has said he does not have the authority to arrest the Israeli leader.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    It makes sense. The guy running (destroying) the USA would probably invade them if they took action.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Apparently, AIPAC has control over these countries’ politicians

      I think it’s more that they’re all on the same imperialist team, that Israel is a partner in crime.

  • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Coming from reddit, it’s interesting to see a world news forum that isn’t entirely and totally captured by Israeli Hasbara mods. I got banned from reddit’s /worldnews for pointing out that “invade Iran” vs “let Iran have nukes” is an asinine false dichotomy. (And I didn’t even use the word “asinine.”)

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think any country that allows things like this should get ignored by the ICC for any criminals that they want to have arrested. France looking for a criminal that stole stuff from the Louvre or something? Nah, ask someone else.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      France (and the rest of capitalist core) is already ignored by ICC. Reading many comments in this thread i see that people seems to have many misconceptions concerning purpose and scale of ICC. In fact, it is not chasing burglars, but it is the colonial court for Africa and the scale of its activities are kinda pathetic since the number of indicted are not many and many of them were not even arrested and judged.

      ICC only had its five minutes when it accused Putin (enthusiastically supported by all the countries that now ignore its accusation against Netanyahu) and now Netanyahu.

      • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago
        1. Colonize Africa, appropriating its land and people.
        2. Stop colonization, but never pay African countries back for it in any noticeable capacity.
        3. Force African countries to join the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund, both of which strongly prioritize rich countries’ interests.
        4. Now they’re not colonies, but they still have to work like slaves to pay off unfair debts.
        5. Force them to join the ICC, which, among other activities, punishes mostly African government officials for forced labour in their countries, without which they would not be able to pay off debts to rich countries.

        This is the West, the one that is supposedly peaceful, democratic, and wants to build a rule-based world order. Yep, checks out.

  • teagrrl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I hate to say I told you so, but I earlier this week said the ICC a neocolonial imperialist institution employs selective justice. Turns out the .today and .worlders were wrong again.

  • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Are Palestinians worth like 20 Iraqi? Why are 50.000 casualties getting so much more recognition the 1million+ Iraqi and Afghani civilians the Americans slaughtered! While it are primarily Americans fighting for the Palestinian cause.

    Almost like there is a political agenda. Bunch of hypocrites, the lot of you.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      50.000 casualties

      Genocide denial

      While it are primarily Americans fighting for the Palestinian cause.

      ???

      • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I see, it is about 77k at moment of writing according to the UN.

        Must be a great argument to win. 1 palestinian is worth only 18 Aghans.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh so not 50k? So you were lying then.

          And we both know damn well that 77k is the number of positively identified direct fatalities (not causalities, as you tried to lie) caused by Israeli munitions, it doesn’t include deaths from indirect causes resulting from the complete destruction of civil infrastructure or deaths that couldn’t be confirmed because the bodies were buried beneath bubble or couldn’t be positively identified by what remains of the Palestinian medical system after it’s systematic destruction by Israel. Meanwhile the number you’re citing for Afghanistan is total excess mortality from all secondary effects.

          But again, you know that, and you’re being dishonest on purpose because you support the genocide going on in Gaza.

    • starsoaked_lily@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      are we pretending that most people protesting the genocide of palestinians do not also abhor the actions of the west in iraq and afghanistan (and iran).

      • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Where’s the actions? Anyone put Bush Jr on the ICC wanted list yet?

        Or Obama for butchering about 200.000 arabs and north africans?

        Did the US ever bothered to acknowledge the ICC? How many protests can you count in the US to join the ICC?

        No? Fantastic counter argument you made there.

  • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Putting aside the question of whether the leadership of those countries actually wanted to arrest him, it’s not obvious to me what they could actually do.

    When an aircraft is passing through, and not actually landing, they could order it to land (which it would refuse to do, presumably), then they could resort to some posturing with fighter aircraft, then they would either have to give up or shoot down a foreign head of state.

    Unless they’re willing to immediately go to war with Israel and the US, and likely a bunch of other countries, there’s really nothing they can do about it

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      If an aircraft enters your airspace without your permission, you can shoot it down. Who is on it is immaterial. I can understand Italy, Greece and Canada not having AA missiles or not wanting to piss off the US, but France can 100% get away with it. The US won’t pick a fight with a nuclear power.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Western Values Hypocrisy laid bare:

      Rules for thee, virtue signalling for me.

      there’s really nothing they can do about it

      Do you think Putin could go through these European airspace without being challenged?

      Give us some more of that mental gymnastics, bud.

      • Trioxin@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Do you think Putin could go through these European airspace without being challenged?

        What are they gonna do? Shoot down the leader of the country with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world?

        • Grapho@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          They would probably threaten to, at least. Denial of airspace, then if he went through anyway there’s zero chance they wouldn’t send fighter jets up there.

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      If a cop wants you to stop your car, don’t do it, you can just keep driving.

      Follow me for more cool life hacks.

        • AlloyAhoy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It goes like this:

          Plane carrying a person accused of crimes against humanity: “Air traffic control ICC this is airplane ABC-123 requesting permission to enter airspace DEF heading 123”

          A country that is a signatory to the ICC and obligated to act on an international arrest warrant for persons wanted to stand trial for crimes against humanity if they enter their territory: “Permission denied, if you eneter this airspace you will be escorted to military base HIJ where you will be detained and escorted to the ICC to stand trail for crimes against humanity.”

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            And then they call your bluff and fly through anyway.

            Then what? You shoot down the prime minister of Israel? You single handedly end NATO, make your nation a pariah, cause a rapid expansion of war in the Middle East, plunge the global market into a depression, and run the risk of causing a world war?

            Yeah there’s a reason why none of these countries did anything. The ICC is a joke and always has been. It has zero actual authority and it’s only purpose has always been to maintain western dominance in the world.

            That’s it.

            • AlloyAhoy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              Then you do exactly what you saif you would do. You ‘escort’ the plane with miltary planes, that have a progressive level of escalation which if taken to the most extreme could be getting shot down.

              • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Absolutely. They’re not going to shoot down and kill a leader of a nuclear power. You’re absolutely insane if you think that’s the encase.

          • ADTJ@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Open a search engine if you want to find out more.

            So arrogant

            I’m well aware of that, but what do you actually expect to happen when that gets ignored? Threaten a plane carrying the leader of a nuclear power? That’ll go well.

            I’d also love to see him in handcuffs but escalation is obviously unproductive when he can’t be safely arrested and planes requesting permission is only a courtesy when there are no consequences to defiance.

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’d also love to see him in handcuffs

              But you’ve already decided that no country should be expected to actually arrest him

              he can’t be safely arrested

              What does “safely arrested” fucking mean? You’ve already declared that no country can use force against him, so he can just say “no” if any country tried to arrest him. He could literally hike through these countries and, according to you, there’s nothing they can do about it.

              • ADTJ@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                But you’ve already decided that no country should be expected to actually arrest him

                You’ve already declared that no country can use force against him

                I literally never said either of those things and don’t agree with them either. But whatever, I’m not gonna continue to argue if you’re just going to make shit up.

                Enjoy your echo chamber, buddy (apt username btw)

                • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I literally never said either of those things and don’t agree with them either.

                  Yes you did, repeatedly. Lying dipshit

                  Enjoy your echo chamber, buddy (apt username btw)

                  Go back to reddit you insufferable fucking loser

              • ADTJ@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                I don’t think they’d immediately press the red button, but they clearly have a capacity to escalate and have shown in the middle east that they’re quite trigger happy

                • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Israel would literally cease to exist if it got in a war with France. Israel isn’t going to war with fucking NATO

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        You plan to not give passage with your amazing mind control skills?

        Your “basic things” proposal needs to be pragmatic.

          • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            I always assume that libs are dumb as fuck but this was just amazing. They don’t know anything holy shit.

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              They’ve become worse than parodies of themselves at this point. Like, Netanyahu could literally drive through these countries and these white supremacists would be arguing “How could they possibly arrest him? He could just say no!”