





Identity politics posits that oppression stems from identity, and that the latter cannot be chosen but is rather an inborn quality. Yet they also claim identity is a social construct. What is expressed by that quality is therefore identity itself. This expressed quality cannot be attacked; conversely, the persons themselves can be attacked, but only if the identity is not. For the sake of simplicity, we will use “identity” in the singular form. How ableism is avoided is thus semantics elevated to an art. Similar to how the religious wittily avoid sinning through careful exegesis of the Bible.
For example, instead of using the usual slur against those affected by ableism, one can attack the person by merely changing the words, just as I once heard that “Donald Trump is mentally deficient.” Or the smart-ass can say that a person’s intelligence is “delayed.” This logic of identity politics brings everyone who subscribes to this struggle to a cul-de-sac. The human being as such and persons themselves no longer matter; only their identity matters. Therefore, since oppression (or fascism) is defined as attacking a person’s inborn quality, this means everything else is a fair target.
Unfortunately, with this kind of logic, it’s acceptable to make fun of red-haired men and even to verbally abuse them à la South Park. In the case of the adult cartoon, even abusing kids is considered fine as long as people who are “red-haired” are not systematically oppressed (a silly example, I know).
A reactionary leftist can abuse a gay man as long as the man’s “gayness” is not attacked. The white man now becomes the ultimate target. Let’s say this particular man is poor; that doesn’t matter to these reactionaries. Nobody “identifies” as poor, and poverty is not an identity. Accordingly, calling a gay white man “white trash” is considered perfectly fine. Idpol is presently “in and of itself.” It must go beyond this and become in and for itself.
The idpol logic grants identities themselves the status of the oppressed, while the human being as such is reduced to nothing. The common man, the average person, aka most people, is reduced to nothing! What identity politics first set its sights on, fighting actual oppression, is now becoming a war on anything other than that. Oppression becomes the universal, the great equalizer, instead of the universal human being who must never be subjected to oppression. A human identity that would be fully universal is precluded and made impossible in this inverted world of “identities as oppression.” Many of them will claim that identity is a “social construct.” It’s not. It cannot be. What we see here is oppression as identity, oppression as appearance, rather than as a relation, a relation between human beings.
In the imperial core, the centralization of capital against the super-exploited periphery created a sort of inverse worldview. In spite of this, it daily re-creates the conditions that will permit the universal human being to come into existence. As long as capital is centralized in this core, what is behind the veil of illusion is the actual class struggle, but super-exploitation did not create the conditions proper for a “pure” class antagonism to emerge. Hence identity politics in the manner of Fukuyama’s end of history. But the ground, the soil in which we fight the class struggle in the imperial core, is the soil that can permit only the result of a pure class antagonism: that is, communism in the flesh, fully born. The inverted side of “actual oppression” is appearance. Therefore, to tame capital here is to destroy capital in the name of the universal human being. The ground is being tilled for the final struggle, the fight for full human emancipation. Yet capital is centrally planted in the core but not centrally planned. The incoming explosion, the break with continuity, the revolution that will emerge in the struggle of capital against the periphery, is the universal human being; it cannot be otherwise.
We have to liberate ourselves by any means necessary. Comrades, in the name of the entire human race, we must be fanatics! In the West, to liberate ourselves from the shackles of capitalism, we must kill the capitalists!
This reads like you’re trying to rationalize an individual reaction to a personal experience with heaps of abstraction. Maybe start by grounding your text by expressing what your personal experience was that motivated writing it. As is, it’s hard to understand what you’re talking about. You use familiar terms, but in a way that seems less and less connected to actual fault lines in the broader discourse or in the material struggle.
You’re starting point problem is already trivial to solve: it’s dialectics. Classes like workers and capitalists are also mere social constructs with real material implications. Gender is similarly constructed. And like class, it has a material base. Class is based in wage labor. Gender is based in reproductive labor. Deconstructing gender is class struggle and transgressing the gender lines set by the capitalist system is also class struggle. Fighting as and for trans and non-binary comrades is class struggle and raises consciousness. Without it, we would be class traitors, wether in the core or elsewhere.
It’s cool, that you’re attempting to approach a problem you encountered with materialism and Marxism. You could start by reading some existing queer Marxist theory.
You’re right about the core having a labor aristocracy and everything and yes, there was a class compromise, that also allowed for some personal freedom in the core in turn for shutting up about imperial wars. It’s not going to last. Imperial super-profits are drying up, the profit rate is falling anyway.
Also fed posting like in the last line will get you banned here. Actually, now that I think about it: New account, no other posts, trying to stir up trouble, fed posting… Makes me wonder