This is intended as a broad and open ended question.

    • alternategait@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      I sat and thought one time about what it would take to replace the plastic I have touched. Most of it is easy to think of good replacements, but there’s a whole bunch more of medical stuff that I can’t imagine replacing.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Agriculture was probably the beginning of the end. And while not necessarily a ‘technology’, the concept of land ownership was a bad idea as well.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      I’m afraid I disagree. Land ownership does go too far though, especially in there modern day. But to me, the fundamentak act of placing land under the ownership of a family who will tend to it over generations, is good

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        That’s not “land ownership”, and ownerership of the land is not a prerequisite condition for stewardship.

  • moondoggie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Not quite technology, unless you factor in the development of cable TV, but 24 hour news networks. That was the start of news as entertainment, as they didn’t have enough to fill 24 hours and had to do whatever they could to get and retain viewers.

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    The concept of proprietary parts.

    If your product is so shitty that your plan to make money is to be the only supplier of parts when it breaks theb just fuck off into the sea.

  • Micromot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    LLMs. Their actual usefulness is so much less than the cost and effort it takes to make the modes. Probably not an unpopular take, especially on this platform.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Must feel great to be the first person to get in an LLM comment on this thread lol. We can close the comments now

      Obviously I agree. Was absolutely distraught to hear this evening that some people/group are advocating for a data centre in the middle of my city in England. LLM has been a net negative on my life and probably ipon the wider world as a whole

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Derivatives and other complex financial instruments.

    Tools for cheating others out of money, obfuscating transactions or skirting legal restrictions.

  • Melobol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Those k-cups, and disposable vapes… You know what? Anything that has disposable in their name.

    Yes even baby and feminine products.
    Disposable cutlery, disposable bags, FAST fashion, the freaking packaging, the non returnable glass/plastic bottles.

  • chocrates@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Fire. If we couldn’t get more calories out of food our calorie hungry brains couldn’t develop more and maybe we wouldn’t be living in this hellacape

  • BeelzebubEiNukuKoskaan@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    2 stroke engines as means of transport for teenage boys.

    What? No, of course that gathering of mopeds 150m from my apartment building isn’t affecting my unbiased opinion on this.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Mopeds do indeed suck, in my opinion, because their technological niche is just “filtering through heavy traffic easily”

      The heavy traffic usually exists because

      • a city has expanded car ownership beyond its transport capacity
      • but cities shouldn’t even be mainly-car, they should be mainly public transport and pedestrian (see c/fuck_cars for more info)

      So they’re basically colving a problem that didn’t need to exist in the first place. The riding of bikes is better for pepple

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        I mean they’re cheaper to buy and operate, easier to park, don’t take up as much space as cars either parked or on the road. They should be more popular, just they should be electric now.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Small 2 stroke engines create more particulate and nitrogen pollution than big excavators and bulldozers.

        Not relatively, per unit. A leaf blower or moped is worse than a 20 ton caterpillar.

  • soyslurper2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Dress shoes

    Rich people wanted to pretend they always ride horses, so they always wore slim shoes. This became the standard for all shoes, and everyone has been suffering since

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Generally just over engineering. Cars used to be serviceable but here we are, thousands of small decisions later, decisions that led to things being standardized as far more complicated. Good luck working on a new car.

    Same trend is everywhere in society. Websites used to be 20 KB of specially formatted text and maybe 500 KB of images. Now they’re literally megs of images and JavaScript and to build one in a modern setting, you’re expected to use and install gigs of dependencies. And beyond that we’re being asked to burn down rainforests for a half genius/half moron machine to “help” us with the process. This is “more efficient” after all.