𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠

There’s no “human right to drive”. It’s why you need to get a license in the first place.

How about you actually put some product like wax or gel in your hair so you can style it properly?

Crossherd #45
🟩🟩🟩⬛️⬛️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬛️🟩🟩🟩🟩
Time: 0:17
🐐crossherd.clevergoat.com 🐐

Ez-pz. Mistapped on my phone on the last one or it could’ve been faster.

Could well be European. EU Windows installs are significantly less bloaty than shit than US installs are.

What makes you say that? Clearly food prices aren’t at the point of unaffordability now. UBI also wouldn’t really create new customers, as people already need food now, UBI just guarantees they won’t have to go into debt to afford it.

What you’re describing makes more sense in an economic context where food is scarce, eg once a retailer has enough customers, they could sell all of their stock. In this scenario, jacking prices makes more sense, because you’re not getting any more customers by lowering them. But food generally isn’t scarce (in the developed world at least), meaning you’re always going to have excess stock. Now, the way to earn more money is to find a delicate balance between lowering prices and gaining more customers (but less revenue per sale, but have more sales and less waste to handle) or increasing prices but losing customers (meaning fewer sales, but more revenue per sale).

UBI isn’t really a factor in that last calculation, because it’s mostly dependent on the prices of your competitors. Of course, in a monopolistic market things are different, but then the price jacking can also happen independently of UBI.

To show a real-life example, take a look at Belgium. The price of food there has been quite low relative to other countries. Why? Because Ahold-Delhaize entered the market and tried competing heavily with existing brands there. The way to do that was through lowering prices, which forced other supermarkets to follow suit. Ahold could afford this, because they own a very significant market share in the Netherlands, where they could in fact increase prices (which is the semi-monopolistic behaviour I mentioned) and offset the cost. Their competitors are less well established or cannot compete at scale, so customers have fewer alternatives (and in locations where they do the prices are lowered a bit again to retain customers).

But then surely UBI doesn’t matter if you believe they’ll jack up prices regardless of a good cause?

Because ultimately people don’t have much more to spend. Any competitor of yours that doesn’t jack up prices will win a lot of customers that way. You don’t want to price yourself out of the market.

Ultimately the same amount of money is in the economy, it’s just distributed differently.

It’s not really “way more”. They’re still only going to spend what they wanted to spend before.

The money also isn’t created out of thin air, it’s obtained through taxes on higher incomes and businesses.

We’ve likely known about Parkinson’s since the 12th century, just never named it as such. But it’s very much possible that pollutants increase the risk.

You did the right thing. I’m not disputing that.

I’m saying it’s a very different thing from people who self-diagnose psychological issues or other diseases, without confirming with a doctor.

You didn’t go “I have a brain tumour, where’s the surgeon”, you persisted in getting a proper diagnosis from a doctor who finally did the right tests.

That’s not really self-diagnosis is it? Self-diagnosis would be you already claiming there was a tumour before doctors found something.

Knowing something off is not diagnosing yourself.

At its widest point, Pangea was approximately 16k km across. The fastest bullet train travels at 603km/h, so it would take approx. 26,5 hours to travel from one end to the other. This does assume a perfectly straight rail and no acceleration time though, so in practice it would take a little bit more time than that.

I’m not willing to let them walk around my country

Which is weird too, like he’s not charged with a crime so what makes him different from a random El Salvadoran citizen?

From the FAQ, they want to eventually move to https://code.europa.eu/

Last I tried Rustdesk (two days ago) it was a buggy, glitchy mess and the shared screen was tearing immensely. Is that recent or did it use to be better?

I’m sure there are. But usually when things are present in groups of a specific race, it’s related to some form of racism.

Classic symptom of an impoverished community. Could be caused by systemic racism or historical events.

If the tariff is too great the cost becomes unspreadable. Spreading cost requires other regions to still afford the new price, and with numbers like this that’s unlikely.

About one-third of Switches were sold in the US. Spreading a 145% tariff means hiking everyone’s prices by 40-50%. That will murder sales in other regions.

Better to eat a 30% temporary loss that adds pressure on Trump to reverse-course than to eat an even higher loss and face backlash worldwide for making others pay for Trumps idiocy.

Obama wore a tan suit once.

Republicans went apeshit due to this fashion choice.

In the EU, the GDPR requires this actually.