This is funny, so I’m leaving my mistake

The command structure is what determines separate forces, do the Chechen forces answer to the same command structures? I know from US coalition operations that the foreign forces answer to their own NCO/Officer Corp. Typically, through to the region level and have their own rules and regulations separate from the other nation forces, often operating from their own bases and really only coordinating at the colonel level or above.

To my understanding, the Chechen forces are barely allowed their own officers at the unit level, much less anything higher. I’m far from an expert on that, though, and may be wrong. If true, I wouldn’t separate them, if false, maybe, as much as the separation of NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Wagner was moved under the Russian regular military after the failed coop. So they’re technically one entity now. (Not that there was ever much of a difference, it’s just less now. )

1/3 will need to justify their presence in writing or be removed.

According to Google, Bofa is slang for “both of.” I’m guessing it’s more of a play on both twins being exercised.

Isn’t there a second song where Johnny loses his soul because of the arrogance?

I’m sure they’ve got parking spots far enough of that no one will complain. I’ve been to 5 Ikea’s, none have had full lots. This seems like a call to attention and drama. (Not sure on whose part.)

I guess this would depend on if C++ has multiple personality disorder.

That’s a strong pointer finger

Wasn’t it in the history of the Russian sniper from that time?

Also, 1 gun per 2-3 man squad. You were to pick up the rifle of the person in front when they died.

Don’t forget Valentine’s day.

Now let’s look at holidays 40 weeks prior…

While Russian cities burn from weakness? I’m sure those patches make take-off uncomfortable. Where is their navy again? I mean, the Black Sea Fleet does have the newest submarines in the arsenal.

Nice

Economy of scale matters, so does practicality. Which one is generally lasting longer per number of charges and what’s the long term viability of both given the time they were build and the available tech at that time? I totally understand the greater availability of sodium vs lithium. However, will it last? Last time I read much about it, reliability was weak, charge capacity over time dropped drastically, and failures were high. (It has been a couple of years, so things may be changing. )

Something new and shiney can be nifty, but past that, what is this? It seems like an expensive hood ornament that will rust in the rain. Lithium is expensive and toxic to mine, but so are all metals to some extent, and this has plenty.

It seems like it’s buying something 25% off on a $100 thing that won’t last well. Sure, you saved $25 once, but you’re buying 3 of them in the same time frame.

Doesn’t California have some insane battery too?

Typically, this means:

1. You’re sending too much frivilous crap mail.
2. You’re viewed as a time cost with low benefit.
3. Your organization is sending too much crap mail, and no one is reading much of anything.

You control 2 of those. The first two have the same solution, send less mail, and label your crap messages as such. (We all have crap mail we need to send to meet technical obligations, but label it to be easily filtered.)

Because cardboard boxes already exist and “created” is poorly used here. https://boulderwine.com/product/bells-two-hearted-ipa-6-pack-cans/

Maybe this is cheaper, but nothing new

I just linked it to show the rare piece of bipartisanship. I agree DLST should be done away with. As to which schedule to keep, I find it to be 6 of one and half dozen of another. The difference is just another nit pick someone will find excuses to argue over.