Yes, for tax purposes. It says nothing about the nutritional content.

Every chemical is potentially risky in sufficient amounts, even water.

It’s not as much of a thing in the US today, but even the European Commission has found that it’s not a problem unless you’re eating 5% of your bodyweight in chlorinated chicken every day. It’s mostly protectionism for European poultry farmers under the guise of safety.

Sources: European Commission. (2003, April). The evaluation of antimicrobial treatments for poultry carcasses.

European Commission. (2008, April). Environmental impact and effect on antimicrobial resistance of four substances used for the removal of microbial surface contamination of poultry carcasses

European Food Safety Authority. (2015). Risks for public health related to the presence of chlorate in food.

I can think of one thing he could do that would get him lots of good press, but it’s typically a TOS violation.

It is if you want to be taken seriously, sweetie.

It’s not unreasonable to ask someone to elaborate or justify their opinion, kiddo.

Well, it’s Trumphog Day… again.

The part where it gives random results of varying quality, sparky.

Your performative concern for animals is noted.

It’s not an insult to us, but they see it as an attack.

Craftsman was the first brand that came to mind.

Because you’re supposed to bully fascists. He’s a couchfucker.

The AP deleted their fact check, and the whole story stated because of a passage in the first printing of his book. He’s a couchfucker.

Which is a type of democracy.

Don’t forget the horrors it’ll produce from absorbing the Dwarf Fortress subreddits.

No, sweetie, you really don’t understand the primary process, or how presidential elections work in this country.

Had his party prevent a primary process? Do you have even the slightest idea of how presidential elections work? The incumbent president enjoys the presumption of being the nominee as long as they can, and want to, run again. If you didn’t understand that the first time around, that’s your fault.

No, it’s making fun of that assumption.

It would cost far more to not address the issue.