






A good chunk of Behavior is basically them celebrating the fall of the Soviet Union so no surprises here unfortunately.
I feel like the third paragraph is definitely directed at Iranians worried about getting hate crimed considering the US’ history with this sort of thing.


I also think Settlers needs to be read in the context that it was written in, namely in the early 80s after the destruction of the civil rights movement and infiltration/breaking apart of most militant Black Liberation groups. If it feels hopeless that is mostly because things really did feel hopeless at that point in time.

Hitler: We must destroy the Judeo Bolshevik menace. We are mortal enemies and they must be subjugated before they can destroy us.
Stalin:


This one is always ridiculous to me because it also implies that the entire Soviet leadership couldn’t like… read what the Nazis were writing and saying about the Soviet Union?


Also even accepting the most propagandized version of the great purge it was in no way a genocide? Like just killing a bunch of people does not constitute a genocide.


That Trotsky quote about a particle of Hitler being lodged in every disgruntled Petit Bourgeoisie except it’s an actual strand of DNA
The new Frankenstein movie slaps though ngl and it definitely doesn’t fall into this trope.


AOC letting her outdoor cats stack rocks, which is supposedly what the unions told her to do


I saw the DPRK troops eating yellow cake

They’ve been using the exact same tactic for 30 years in that region, remember the fucking playing cards? Just absurd chauvinism and hubris to assume that their enemy can’t or won’t adapt.
Blood in my Eye is definitely on my shortlist of books to recommend to people


To be fair most prominent communists would have been god-tier posters.


You make the theory
We’ll do the praxis

Russia is saying this or that step is escalation, but defense is not escalation
If there’s one thing I want from a foreign policy chief it’s a complete refusal to accept the reality of a situation.