I learned about it from my father… :'(

Well, yeah, but in the reverse…

"Boss hitting for 90% and sometimes one-shotting me in every fight.

Me and mah boy paladins repeatedly hitting one guy and healing so that he stacks up buffs and one-shots the boss.

Blizzard: Horrified stoner man"

Lol, physiologists say hi, and they need that natural log function you’ve been hiding back.

Yep. That’s why I brought up my comment. I thought for years that discussing your salary was a really bad thing, because so many people talk about how you’ll get fired for it. Imagine my surprise when I actually read through those NLRB posters in the break room…

This is why everyone needs to talk about their salary. Shatter that idiotic notion about pay rate discussions being bad, because it only benefits the assholes at the top sucking every penny they can.

I’ve seen that line about the “man breaking, the horse splashing” somewhere on Lemmy in the past week. I never knew it was a quote or where it was from. Neato. The fellow clearly had some interesting insights.

That would be worse. Anime stylized faces do not work in the 3d space. I’d imagine we’d see a new trend of fancy molded art to match each car’s look and personality…

Ah, who am I kidding? Some exec will just put fucking smileys on the car.

I just use a value ranking system and rapidly sort variables until I reach the highest possible value.

Women>Men

Pop colors > blending (red is greater than brown, etc.)

Interesting features > bland (So a dude with a scar registers higher than a dude without)

Anomalies > expecteds (a top hat is more interesting than a ball cap)

There’s probably some other minor variations that account for my choices. Thinking about it, the preference for women may be due to them having more eye-catching variables than men in most cases, especially with regards to color and accessories.

So… does this tip involve procreation-like activities between consenting ‘not parental’ father figures?

Voat was batshit crazy, but some of the things done there were done well. I really liked that the ‘big subs’ were considered voat run, so the moderators didn’t get to make their own little kingdoms of folly in the most popular areas. The commitment to free speech was great. It just went down so hard because the first people who went to it were the type to scrawl on the walls of their house in pastel crayon and neon spray paint.

Sheesh, I’ll leave this here for both of you.

Okay, I’m taking that. It’s mine now. It’s beautiful.

What’s amusing to me is that one of the stated reasons the religious nut jobs were persecuted was for their anti-war beliefs. Somehow that script got flipped.

It takes a while to get through the blagh that the midseason brings, each and every season.

Now that you say that, it’s really an odd, surreal experience. Were my fellow children unique, and just did not grow up, and made a blend of their childhood and what should be adult pursuits, or were people in the past just as fucked up, but all they had to make porn of was Charles Dickens and Dante and such?

Well, sure, but that’s why you read GoT and don’t watch it. Also, bad endings and all that.

Fair enough. Different states, different rules.

Very few, if we’ve been paying attention. Which protests/riots had more cops willing to shoot at those involved? The heavily armed ‘marches’ that we’ve seen, or the large crowds of unarmed individuals? Sure, some of that may have been because of bias from the police, but I guarantee most of it was because they were afraid of starting a shooting when there was the possibility of being shot back at.

Same here, but their true address is still held somewhere. It’s only the displayed address on a driver’s license that shows the police station/court. Listing it as their address for voting purposes probably is probably murky, and not explicitly allowed or explicitly illegal.

I’m really curious (as I’m not living there) what the difference is. Is it just their religious tendencies? Or is it their feelings towards the nebulous “other” that defines them?