This is the way

If that’s what you conclude then I don’t think you read it

I concluded exactly what the title of this post says

I didn’t conclude that

I would hope that everyone already knows that it does. One has to balance risks as they see fit.

In this case yes, although it comes off as a very mild complaint

I read all of it actually

I have literally not seen anyone complain about it. As the tweet says “we just accept”.

Yeah it’s the author’s virtue signal which is why you can trust their conclusions which say the opposite of their bias in favor of vaccines

Thanks, fixed now

Sorry you’re offended by statistics.

And similar patterns hold for lesser killers such as measles, which didn’t have a vaccine until the 1960s, but which by then had already declined in mortality by more than 90% from its 1900 levels.1,4

Did you read the article? There’s quite a few graphs showing how mortality for infectious diseases already became very low before vaccines were introduced. There’s simply no way that the decline in measles or tuberculosis mortality was mostly due to vaccines, antibiotics or surgeries since they were only in use after mortality had declined 75-90%. Smallpox is one of a very small number of exceptions to this rule.

Gee, I had no idea socialism was so popular in England before Marx. And somehow they only started caring about fair distribution of profits when their jobs were being taken by machines. Whatever helps you sleep at night.

I guess these facts hurt your feelings

Everything was better before computers

Agreed. This technology’s existence is a net negative to humanity, whether everyone has it or just the police have it. It all needs to be stopped, no exceptions for any government agency, research lab, corporation and non-profit organization.

I’m much more concerned about crises being an excuse to expand government powers than to privatize or deregulate. That’s the problem in this particular instance too. Both can be bad but expanding government powers is almost always bad.

This post wasn’t about recommendations, just information that people should know. Make your own decisions based on your own assessment of the risks and likely returns associated with each option. I’d say precious metals in your physical possession are a simple option with low risk but that’s my opinion.

Better to stash precious metals since they won’t lose their value. Of course there are other options so make your own decisions based on your own assessment of the various risks involved.

Voting gives the system an appearance of consent and legitimacy. Mass non-compliance is the answer.