Pro-woman, tree centaur, extremist, hexproof, shadowbanned, empath

Unable to form predictions or tier lists. In love.

  • 54 Posts
  • 73 Comments
Joined 23 days ago
cake
Cake day: March 5th, 2026

help-circle










  • All those talk shows fit the descriptions of CIA ops to scramble people who gravitate towards different ideologies or interests while uniting them on key premises. Haiphong’s Telegram mods have long banned people who argue with their pet fascists.

    Also while you’re here keep in mind who promoted Freak Offs For Syria types like Rania Khalek, Vijay Prashad, and Yanis Varoufakis. There’s really not that many of these people when you get down to it, because “content creators” are just a CIA plot to trick kids into consuming illegal military propaganda and enlist manchildren as free labor + donation pigs, and the banks are running out of money, go take out all your money and fill up as many plastic bags with gas as you can














  • In order to practice this more generally, people need to be taught.

    Bingo, also my biggest weakness. It’s my fault for making my studies a tiny group chat-based internet egg hunt for too long to shut it out, I didn’t give explaining stuff enough deep thought & my poor skills make me turn to withering remarks, because I’m used to people I’ve talked to for years. I am awful at teaching people thinking skills. Reasonable at teaching them language skills, though. I can completely sympathize with people who believe they need to balance left unity online in order to ensure reform orgs can get traction, I was there a few years ago for heavens’ sake, but it’s actively shutting down substantive conversations. Not that I started one here, I just disagree with the “takes are harmful” principle. Skill issue.



  • Well maybe people could attempt analysis instead of mindlessly regurgitating their favorite riffs on events. It’s actually good for everyone to be involved in this rather than traipsing after media and “content creators”, it develops mental skills and motivates them to learn about the world. It can be positive social activity, but you won’t get that in America, so you tend to assume it’s worthless for anyone to give their take. You just need higher standards for discussion. Discussion and academic/industry knowledge should proliferate among workers, demystifying current events and production. This is why CNET is so powerful.

    I’m tired of hearing variations of “the news is sad and divides people” from those who refuse to expand their sources beyond what is aggregated to them.