

@JakeSparkleChicken Isn’t it?! Yes, I also can’t quite justify it at the moment either, but maybe if I save up… In the meantime, isn’t it just awesome that a new RPN calculator has been released that isn’t a 40 year old recreation?!
Physician into R, data science, immunology, cancer, T cell lymphoma, skin lymphoma, EPR, motorbikes, keyboards, linux, UbuntuMATE, FOSS, retrogames, Amigas.


@JakeSparkleChicken Isn’t it?! Yes, I also can’t quite justify it at the moment either, but maybe if I save up… In the meantime, isn’t it just awesome that a new RPN calculator has been released that isn’t a 40 year old recreation?!


@JakeSparkleChicken @[email protected] Ah so just +/-/÷/× and maybe an x²?


@SmartmanApps @calculators No it’s not that one (the one shown is a two-line type), although, as you know, all Sharps will evaluate the same way, even back to your original 531WH. I’ll have a peek on that website…


@SmartmanApps @calculators In fact it might be called the EL-W516T where you are?


@JakeSparkleChicken Thanks! I like the UI so far, lots of features seem implemented well. Have heard about issues with trickier integration, but not about trig - do you have any examples?


@SmartmanApps @calculators It’s a EL-W506T, though might have a different name in other markets.
@wischi “Funny enough all the examples that N.J. Lennes list in his letter use implicit multiplications and thus his rule could be replaced by the strong juxtaposition”.
Weird they didn’t need two made-up terms to get it right 100 years ago.
@JakeSparkleChicken It does look good!!