• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle





  • Not to diminish any particular arguments, but this is how these conversations always play out in my view:

    Stop burning fossil fuels.

    But we are in overshoot.

    Yes

    But we won’t be able to keep up agriculture.

    Yes

    But we won’t be able to keep up industry

    Yes

    But we won’t be able to keep up consumerism

    Yes

    But people will die.

    Yes :(

    But the rich will loses their riches

    Yes

    but but but

    It doesn’t matter what the cost is, that’s the solution. The rest is simply consequence - and it grows greater by each day we ignore it.

    Just because an ask is nigh impossible, does not mean that it is foolish or that it comes from ignorance.





  • Hm. Maybe I’m missing something but I’m not seeing a million ‘successful’ AI startups pop up overnight like during the Dot Com Bubble. Most of the AI investments I’ve seen have been from major corporations that can pivot and eat a little loss. I do see several resume and business-plan writing services but it just doesn’t seem like much of a parallel, to me.

    The article doesn’t address this disparity, it just pretends like it’s an equivalency - citing only megacaps like GOOG, MSFT, etc. Clickbait headline, I guess.





  • …I’m too informed to believe that a hand gun would be useful against these assault weapons, sorry.

    I grew up around these things, you see - and hated them for years. Then at one point I realized I was just about the only leftist around, and just about the only person without a gun around, and the math clicked for me: It’s a much stickier situation than anyone really wants to acknowledge.

    I’ve seen them carried around frequently while in the US - people carry them openly displayed on the back of their trucks. Who’s to guess how many have guns in their cabins and trunks? I’ve also followed the US’ wars closely enough to know that modern warfare looks like a bunch of armed citizens in a hilux, and that a state border won’t be saving any leftists stuck in southern Illinois when the RWDSs return.

    Edit: I’m standing by this one. Disagree as you will.


  • If you find a hole hidden under geological eras, and it was made just for you and you knew it… you wouldn’t feel tempted at all to just… take a step in… a unique hole unlike any other in the world, this one welcoming you like your own shadow with its depths… and confirm that someone really did carve out your exact silhouette?

    It’s certainly something I could imagine happening in a dream. Like my recurring dream of driving off of bridges.

    There is a Buddhist element of reincarnation going on which might be lost on some foreign audiences, but the feeling it is trying to summon should be familiar - a strange familiarity of something that should be unknown to you, an inexplicable intuition, something that feels like it could be from a past life, a premonition, deja vu.

    If none of this is relatable to you, that’s okay, but it is relatable to myself and many others. Hopefully you don’t have recurring dreams about driving off of bridges, either.


  • The surreal aspects beg you to drop your hyper-criticism and to look for deeper imagery. I love it. And he can do it in such a short form, while also managing to singularly capture the psychological horror as well as anyone.

    Imagine present day Stephen King telling stories through a one-shot manga. The action wouldn’t even be started before he ran out of paper! Of course, King has his own masterful way of conveying horror and it works very well, too.




  • All this probably happened because we stopped to geoengineer by outlawing ships blowing sulphur into the air which created additional cloud cover.

    You have your causality running backwards… this was already here, and the sulfur was masking it. This happened because we put so many GHG in the air.

    It works, and without wrecking havoc on the overall system.

    Europe is the one that initiated the sulfur reductions. With the additional dimming data now available, they reviewed it to determine how much damage had been caused. The conclusion? The benefits of reducing sulfur actually outweigh the damage of unmasked warming. The plan for further reductions was upheld.

    If we mask radiative forcing, we don’t want to be doing it with sulfur. That leads to acid rain, ocean acidification, and asthma and other diseases. CaCO3 is a candidate. The long-term consequences of any candidate is unknown. Except that we know that the less sulfur raining down on us and the fish in general, the better.


  • doomer@lemmy.worldtoDigital Art@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    lol ok

    I get it, English speakers don’t speak other languages, and the rest of the world is invisible to them. Old news.

    But over in Japan the net was in an uproar over Barbenheimer (not in a good way, if that wasn’t clear). See here and here for my favorite products of the backlash.

    I honestly thought this might have been retaliation in a meme war… and I thought it was hilarious. Too good to be true?