Peacepath

saying that about women is ok, but about men it is misandry?

I am so sorry, I did not mean to harm anyone, I took this post as humour and my comments was made with humour too…

It fits guys quite well too… unless you already set them as not trustable at all, which I would understand…

What about a kind of cocktail with at most 20% red wine filled with sparkling water?

It sounds weird, I agree, but it has few calories, is refreshing, is tasty and may remain cheap enough as you do not need a great wine for it.

Spelling correctly as the basic indicator of intelligence? Does it mean those suffering of dyslexia are stupid? And do we become dumb when using a foreign language? And how to treat cases of words like “colour”/“color”?

Also, would I speak dogs language with mistakes, rather than not at all, would it make more or less smart?

Your graphics make me feel as “nationalism” being a rebranded “patriotism” to maintain the basics of a concept that was fadding away. And for the few I know, both were mostly used as an excuse to make some poeple fight those from the other side of the river, and to make believe in a natural difference between “us” and “them”.

I don’t understand well why “them” should be excluded of the good aspect you are refering to.

As long as one of us isn’t abble to afford one of this, no one is really free ; as we won’t be free from the fear that situation could affect us or some of our relatives…

It is too late to be scared. Enjoy an other breath while you still can.

The official economical theory says that their is no relation between the wage and the income ; since you would (obviously?) work twice longer per day if your wage was halfed (unless you are lazy).

It is a bit hard to find examples where workers really accepted to do so, at least up to that point… because those who work hard are lazy and don’t deserve to become rich, unlike the kids of shareholders (or else the system would be unfair, since they receive more than workers…)

Giving money to poors, they would spend it and increase economic activity. That would create more money and therefore pay back that was given to the poors. But they would not be that poor anymore, and teenagers would cost far too expensive for the bilionaires’ pleasure (and most would even just refuse). As long as the choice is let up to the richests, the poors won’t be founded but by fear…

Some unspecified promises of confort later, or freedom now and forever? Of course I do not go anywhere but remain at that holly Gnu Emacs !

I think javscrpit caste the strings “0” and “false” to true, yes…

Simple javscript casting, if the string contains at least one char, it means yes ; else it means no.

It seems “woke” come from groups of activists uniting in the belives that as long as their will be some kind of discriminations they will all be in a threat.

Therefore, all discriminated (including those who were, and those who could become) should unit and oppose, both to that discrimination and to the principle of discrimination.

Just as you may or not be actualy victim of some type of racism, but if you have some origines that could become discriminated some day. And the woke view is that you should refuse and oppose all kind of discrimination based on race or origines, because as long as one is seen as acceptable, yours could become (remain, or become back) at threat.

This as made a big union of groups opposed to conservative views. So feminist would also fight against racism, etc.

So by extension and out of fear, “woke” is the union of all type of those who do not fully follow the actual system ; at least for those who fully follow it.

May you could try to find people who like the things you like?

You are right, I didn’t see she threw a chair at him ; just that she threw a chair.

Also, I don’t think all those who have had a bad behavior are needingly bad persones. It seems to have happend once, monthes ago, because of anger. By deduction, it was the worse she has ever done ; and we don’t know the context (but Op decided to remain with her after that).

Right or not, Op seems to wish to keep the relationship and to improve it. Maybe you would not if you were in his shoes, and I don’t know if I would. I don’t know if I would agree with your life choices either. But I agree to respect both yours and Op’s own life choices.

And finally, if I someday ask advices to improve my relationship, I would not expect to be suggested to leave, but to be given advices on how to improve it. Else I would be asking advice on “should I maintain this relationship”… So I am sorry you be disappointed that I answer the way I would wish to be answered ; but I encourage you to try to juge less at others.

I know it is easy to say, but try to calm down on alcohol ; not to stop it fully, but being drunk won’t help you neither at sex neither in your relationship.

Try to have nice or fun activities with her, even just walking arround in parc, river side, or nice places ; with phones on silent mode and taking the time to be together.

Eventually, confess to her that you feel bad about how you behaved with her and beg her forgiveness ; don’t give her too much details, and try not to hurt her while doing so…

Well, races are made by breeding individuals in order to create a group with common traits (such as bulldogs, for dogs). And so it implies livestock…

Humanity isn’t the livestock of some intelligence that would control its breeding.

Therefore, humanity is a crual and savage wild specie…

No Emacs?

It does, I just can’t figure out how to reply to chat messages with the app I am currently using…

But I received your message :)

yes please