In my uninformed understanding of humans and their history, unifications happen only in the face of crises and threats (and far from all the time, clearly). Maybe–hopefully–the world eventually makes common cause in order to stabilise the world as things spiral out of control in a few decades, but right now our species appears more concerned about whom gets to dictate what and how humans should live and behave like.
Blóðbók
- 9 Posts
- 166 Comments
There is no rule that the angles of a triangle add to 180 degrees. It only holds true in Euclidean geometry, which this is not.
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto World News@lemmy.ml•In South Korea, outrage over key ‘pro-Japan’ appointments reopens WWII wounds2·11 months ago“Washington” seems quite convinced of an imminent WWIII, and I’m guessing they intend to spend a lot of time in Asia.
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto science@lemmy.world•American Science is in Dangerous Decline while Chinese Research Surges, Experts Warn | Scientific American1·11 months agoThis sounds very interesting. I wouldn’t mind if you expanded on it.
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto science@lemmy.world•American Science is in Dangerous Decline while Chinese Research Surges, Experts Warn | Scientific American1·11 months agoProblem for the USA
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto[Dormant, please move to [email protected]] Movies and TV Shows@lemm.ee•From the people who brought you GOT season 8 comes a show that has a bad ending people are shocked SHOCKED I SAY!2·11 months agoPeople are upset at the lack of an episode 9 and 10 to finish the season, and while upset, one is more like to pick up on everything and anything else that could be interpreted as bad. Then one wants to find validation online. So the internet is rife with people upset at the series, picking it apart and complaining about all the details that can be complained about - things that few would have complained about had there been an episode 9 and 10 to resolve at least some of the now highly pressurised cliffhangers.
Edging is fun until you realise you’re actually not getting any.
I liked the season and enjoyed every episode, except in some sense the finale. It was good TV, but I felt stressed for most of its duration because they kept drawing it out and I couldn’t imagine how they would manage to resolve all the built-up tension in the time left. When there was about 10 minutes left I began to realise that all these things they were talking about on the screen were unlikely to materialise, but thought that maybe they’d focus it all on a spectacular scene in King’s Landing. All hope left me when it was down to 5.
I want to complain about how they spent their screen time, but I’d rather there were simply 2 more episodes because I enjoy the pace. Maybe they could have cut the mud fight.
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto Fediverse@lemmy.world•UPDATE! Now 30% of Lemmy Apps display posts accuratelyEnglish2·11 months agoAt the very least it doesn’t handle spoilers correctly
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto Star Wars Television@lemmy.world•The Star Wars community has launched a fan campaign to get The Acolyte season 2English1·1 year agoWhere did
Spoiler
Plagueis
appear?
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Is there any advantage to tying game logic to frame-rate?1·1 year agoIt may be of critical importance in some games that, no matter how low the framerate is, the player never misses an event due to skipped frames.
There are also games that are not real time even in their animations, and so there may be no benefit to skipping frames rather than just letting it run at whatever framerate. Slowed tick rate mostly feels weird if one has certain expectations for the passage of time.
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto Technology@beehaw.org•Goldman Sachs: AI Is Overhyped, Wildly Expensive, and Unreliable2·1 year agoOnce. They do not have the ability to learn or adapt on their own. They are created by humans through “deep learning”, but that is fundamentally different from continuously learning based on one’s own actions and experiences.
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto Technology@beehaw.org•Goldman Sachs: AI Is Overhyped, Wildly Expensive, and Unreliable2·1 year agoWe are prediction machines, but nothing like chatgpt. Current AI has no ability to learn, adapt, or even consider the future.
Our jackdaw regular will tear up things around it and throw them around when it gets frustrated (such as when it wants a treat without having to put in any effort).
It could simply be bold and really frustrated.
Oops, my brain filtered too much information. My bad 😅
That looks so much like a raven that had its tail feathers and beak swapped out.
What type of bird is it?
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto Science@lemmy.ml•China beats US for first time in global scientific ‘hot papers’ ranking116·1 year agoObligatory sinophobia. Every thread.
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto Linux@lemmy.ml•Purism (creator of FOSS friendly phones and hardware) 2023 financial report , income grew by 350% in three years and the company is profitable12·1 year agoWell I upvoted the post so that people will see the comments!
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto Linux@lemmy.ml•Purism (creator of FOSS friendly phones and hardware) 2023 financial report , income grew by 350% in three years and the company is profitable8·1 year agoYou managed to get your money back?! How?
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto Linux@lemmy.ml•Purism (creator of FOSS friendly phones and hardware) 2023 financial report , income grew by 350% in three years and the company is profitable14·1 year agoI think that’s an american thing. Besides, that money is long gone since I made the purchase several years ago.
Blóðbók@slrpnk.netto Linux@lemmy.ml•Purism (creator of FOSS friendly phones and hardware) 2023 financial report , income grew by 350% in three years and the company is profitable51·1 year agoI asked for a refund when they kept delaying shipment of my Librem 5. I was simply denied and that was it. They told me I could still choose to receive the phone, but I don’t want it since it’s a bad, practically useless product now.
I reported them in my country for it.
That phrasing was obviously hyperbole, since 100% dependence isn’t even a well-defined statement (you can not assign a simple percentage to degree of dependence). Using it as a point to argue against is misguided at best, disingenuous at worst. You should read it as “it is definitely dependent [to a high degree]” rather than “it is entirely dependent”.