Doesn’t mean they will sell them, because the demand could be to low. The trend is going to “multi-purpose vehicles (including sport utility vehicles and crossovers)” https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/251017/cg-c001-eng.htm The same trend is happening in Europe. I could see the financial pressure building right now counteracting it a little bit, smaller cars could benefit like electric already are, but that’s just a guess.

Would be funny if they would move the game with him to Canada, but FIFA just cut him out and want people to forget it. All about the money…

Bei Amazon Haul oder ähnlichen Dropshippern bist Du immerhin nicht der Importeur und somit der Depp, der haftet.

Da sagt dein verlinkter heise Kommentar aber was anderes, oder? Offler sagt doch das:

2. amazon Haul. Die lassen dich als Käufer, Empfänger und Einführer für die Haul Sachen erscheinen, ist damit praktisch gleichzusetzen mit : du bist Inverkehrbrigner, sie nur Vermittler.

Steht so auch in den Amazon Haul AGBs und würde doch heißen, dass man auch bei Amazon Haul selber haftet. Bei den Produkten ist bei Sicherheitsinformationen meißt ein EU-Unternehmen angegeben was angeblich überprüft, ob das Produkt den gesetzlichen Anforderungen entspricht. Das heißt aber trotzdem nicht das sie irgendwelche Pflichen von dir übernehmen.

Just looked up, a windturbine has less infrasound then cars. (german Source) I would guess the datacenter could have more infrasound and thus be a bigger problem. They mention a study about windturbine infrasound and they point towards nocebo effect, but maybe windturbines are at a border where the health effects are very difficult to measure. So maybe studies about the infrasound of datacenters could find something. On the other hand, datacenters bring a lot more pollution factors, like light-, air- and waterpollution.

Finanzkrise: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_financial_crisis Ich frage mich eher: Was ist danach so anders, dass es nur noch runter geht? Und Was ist seit ca 1992 so anders im Bezug auf Ausländer? Edit: Im Bezug auf Ausländer: 1991 Zerfall Jugoslavia - 1992 Vertrag von Maastricht - 1993 Europäischer Binnenmark. Also das dauerhaft höhere Niveau ist Resultat der EU-Freizügigkeit und besserer Beziehungen der europäischen Länder.

This is most likely a nothingburger, because other age groups have the same rate of emigration willing people. In German: https://tube.funfacts.de/w/uV2VJ1XmsG2MMgqQTekmFD Edit: machine translation of the video transcript: There are many quality criteria for scientific studies.

Can the results be representatively applied to the average society? How were the methods evaluated? That’s what we wanted to directly verify with this youth trend study. But you have to buy it on the authors website for €73.90. That’s €73 more than I earn today. And they’d probably also deduct the 9 cents for the glass of tap water. Join the gang! What we did find out for free on the study aurhors website. The study—the author seems quite proud of it—is known, among other things, from Lanz und Brecht and Gemischtes Hack. Those are actually nice podcasts, at least one of them. But still nothing I’d use to promote my scientific credibility. I might as well have the Amigos sing my study. We tried to find a license-free photo of Markus Lanz, but mostly found photos he uploaded to Wiki Comments. So, here’s our photo with Markus Lanz. He photographs a lot of birds—I don’t know why. We have different audiences and different platforms. So, to all the young women on Instagram and TikTok, we see you, we hear you. And to all the old men on YouTube, Lanz und Brecht is not a science podcast. The €73.90 also includes appealing infographics. We didn’t have the money for that, so we just made up an infographic. This study is basically the Galileo of scientific works. So, let’s get back to emigration. 21 percent of young people want to emigrate according to this trend study. That’s the same as the national average. Pretty wild, if you ask me. Average is already wild. Or, to put it in terms for Galileo viewers, that’s ten football fields in Saarland.

Also they own the production side which could be a big problem. If you compare it to music streaming, where every streaming service nearly has the same music, the competition isn’t based on the product but on the available content. That gives more power to the big corporations, because you also have to accept with their streaming deal if you produce with them. Also it promotes piracy that harms the creatives payout from streamers. And possibly the quality of content suffers as the streamers want mass content to draw the most people to their service. If the movie producers could sell to all streaming services simultaneous the competition would only be based on the service. Meaning Price, streaming quality, amount of ads and additional services would be a much bigger selling point.

Hauptziel” des Abkommens “die Gegenseitigkeit beim Informationsaustausch”

Die Gegenleistung ist nicht fair für die Bürger, aber für die Behörden. Denn das würde bedeuten sie dürfen gegenseitig ihre Bürger ausspionieren lassen. Praktisch, weil die eigenen darf man ja offiziell nicht massenhaft überwachen, aber keiner kann es verbieten Tipps von anderen anzunehmen.

Hauptziel” des Abkommens “die Gegenseitigkeit beim Informationsaustausch”

Das heißt die nehmen die Spionage in Kauf, wenn sie dafür die US-Bürger ausspionieren dürfen.