We still get bills and charity letters for the previous owners 5 yrs later. Every one gets rts, no longer at this address, and we asked royal mail not to deliver stuff not addressed to us. Didn’t make any difference

Have you ever heard a Golden eagle call? They hae a weak thin call, like a seagull. This isn’t macho enough for the US, so they always play a different call on films, that of a hawk!

When there is no social safety net, and you need money to live you can’t afford to be picky.

Forced to. People are forced into these jobs…

I think the humour in the first few episodes was Mcfarlens way of sneaking the show past the network suits - he sold it as family guy meets star trek, then switched on them once it was established.

Yeah, guaranteed I would be the first 🤣

Probably!

In England it’s illigal to keep a squirrel in captivity, but it’s also illigal to release a captured squirrel back into the wild, so the only option is to (humanely) kill the poor fucker.

Thanks.

Thanks for this!

Like I said, it’s a shame there’s no way to avoid playing into ‘their’ hands and giving them all that extra revenue.

If only there were some way to avoid speeding…

I love how they say there are “tough decisions” to be made about benefits. You’re going to cut benefits and cut taxes, same as you’ve been doing for the last 14 yrs, and any other time you had power. Why’s it so tough? You should be really fucking good at it by now!

Yes, there is a difference, but it’s barely perceptible, therefore it makes no difference which one is picked. If you actually have a preference go with that one. Otherwise flip a coin.

Also, bones are supposed to be the sacrificial weak point, to protect the high value organs from shock damage. Having indestructible bones would lead to fucked up internal organs and brain damage.

God damn you, that’s all I can read now 😂

Nah, we have already exploited everything that can be easily exploited. Look at the effort we need to get new oil or metal deposits. Humans 2.0 will struggle to build basic machinery.

The risk is not so much Threads having access to our data, but thst Threads, with millions of users and teams of full time devs, becomes the standard, allowing Meta to control the development of the open source protocol, and browbeating everyone into using their instance/version/servers.

What a pointless question though. Obviously in the context ‘Nazi’ means what it means NOW.

‘Peadophiles should be locked up’ ‘ah but what if the definition of Peadophile changes to incorporate anyone who has sex??’

In addition to the reply from the other chap, I’d point out that UEFA bought charges against city with absolutely no credible evidence and tried to ban them from competition. So I don’t see how one could reach the conclusion that city bribed them?