@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • edit-211 months agoThis could be humorous… but it’s actually tragiclemmy.caimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1328arrow-down140file-text
arrow-up1288arrow-down1imageThis could be humorous… but it’s actually tragiclemmy.ca@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • edit-211 months agomessage-square67fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink20•edit-211 months ago Deadlier for whom? The people the driver of the bigger car cannot see.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•11 months agoAnd also people in a smaller vehicle involved in a collision. Higher bumper heights hit windows instead of crumple zones.
minus-squareJilanicolinkfedilinkEnglish2•11 months agoFair. Tech (sensors, cameras, etc.) could reduce this risk, but you make a fair point.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•11 months agoBetter road design and just having fewer cars would do a lot more than sensors.
The people the driver of the bigger car cannot see.
And also people in a smaller vehicle involved in a collision. Higher bumper heights hit windows instead of crumple zones.
Fair. Tech (sensors, cameras, etc.) could reduce this risk, but you make a fair point.
Better road design and just having fewer cars would do a lot more than sensors.