• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4211 days ago

    No, it’s because they have compound eyes. Even if they could afford all the different lenses they need, they’d never have enough time to put them in and take them out, while still working a full day.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1211 days ago

      surely they could just make one big lens with facets in it? sure they’re gonna be hellishly expensive but at least they’re usable

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1811 days ago

        Honestly, I was already out of my depth with the entomology and ophthalmology discussed here. The economics of bee optometry might be a bridge too far for me. Can a bee make enough honey to afford such lenses? If so, does it improve the bee’s ability to make honey enough to justify the cost? I have no idea and no clue regarding how to investigate this issue.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          910 days ago

          perhaps we’re coming at this from the wrong direction, does a bee even need lenses? maybe what they actually need is just eye protection, which would make everything much cheaper

          • TXL
            link
            fedilink
            English
            710 days ago

            Correction or no, it seems something like goggles is the solution. Boggles?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            510 days ago

            Interesting hypothesis. I guess the best way to test it would be to try to sell bee safety glasses to beekeepers.

            • ddh
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 days ago

              You can alway upsell them on bee ears to hold the glasses on