DISCLAIMER: this is not my content that was removed, I just came across it in the modlog and found it to be absurd. If it’s not allowed, I totally understand.
Reason removed was because it’s unrelated.
Unrelated……
The guy was illegally deported without due process. And yet for some reason, suggesting so is somehow “unrelated” to a meme that is trying to say that because he is affiliated (no charges were ever filed against him for gang-related activity) with a gang, he is by default, guilty.
What’s ironic, is that the entire point of the meme is that the bullshit about him being in MS-13 is unrelated to the fact that people want accountability for this administration illegally deporting a man without due process.
This mod has definitely chosen the correct name.
And even taken into consideration that the instance is essentially a troll haven for wayward 4Chan refugees, they should still have to adhere to the rules of common sense.
I never said you had said you were pleased about it. I said you should be pleased about it, now that it’s had the absolutely 100% predictable result, and you should be proud to tell all the people scared or suffering because of it how this was an impact of your master plan to improve the Democrats, and how well it’s working, and how important it was for you so you could accomplish your goals.
it’s also met my theory, or anyone else’s. it’s a charicature made up by democrat party apologists. it’s a strawman.
What was your theory for how refusing to support the Democrats was going to produce an improvement in the world, then? Tell me.
I can’t speak for others. I was hoping their candidate would back off of supporting Israel and their sitting president would follow suit. it didn’t happen so I don’t know why you’d think I or anyone else would be pleased, or think it worked, or that that Democrats aren’t responsible for their own failures
Super realistic. Absolute master stroke. And look how well it worked. I apologize for ever have criticized you or your strategy.
your sarcasm doesn’t prove the fictional people you are lambasting ever existed, either.
I’m literally criticizing the strategy you just explained to me.
Edit: Oh, also, I’m criticizing some of the people I quoted up above who said that Trump might actually be better on Israel and similar things. I linked to them so you can see they are not imaginary. But, you don’t necessarily have to be responsible for their viewpoint. I am also criticizing your viewpoint you just expressed to me, also, though.
which is far a field from where this discussion started, because someone is moving the goalposts.
I made an edit just now (before seeing your response), specifically tying it back to the place this discussion started.
Also, asking what you think so I can clarify why that, also, is wrong, is not at all moving the goalposts. It’s just scoring one goal and then another one.
those comments were made after the election and things did change. they are not evidence those positions were held prior to the election. you’re just wrong
You really want me to take more time digging up more comments about this?
Okay sure.
They were actually easier to find, starting at the opposite end of the search list, than the other ones more recently. I think Trump getting elected means that some of these accounts have calmed down or moved on to other things, as the horror of what they were advocating has come to pass, whereas before the election it was a typhoon of this stuff and it was easier to depart from reality in their predictions.
Edit: Took the colons away so the links work