• @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          03 days ago

          And fucking your wife every single day is no guarantee she will get pregnant. What’s your point?

          • WolfmanEightySix
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 days ago

            The original and most basic point of a condom is to stop pregnancy. If it can’t even do that why would you feel confident in its ability to do anything else?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              This comment made me lose some brain cells. How can you not stop to think for one second before posting this?

              “A car is not guaranteed to get you from A to B, it could break down on the way. So its basically useless”

              “A jacket doesnt guarantee protection from rain, why would you think it can keep you warm?”

              “A toothbrush doesnt get rid of all the bacteria in your mouth, waste of time”

              The moment you realize the world isnt made up of 1 and 0.

              • WolfmanEightySix
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 days ago

                The guy I’m replying to said condoms, no ifs, buts, or maybes, would stop an STD.

                Now, I can appreciate my comment might not be the best phrased, but I am the problem here? Ok. I’ll be better.

                  • WolfmanEightySix
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    02 days ago

                    I have read it. I took it to mean that they were suggesting use a condom to prevent STDs.

                    Still do to be fair.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              03 days ago

              I don’t think your grasp of statistics and logic is quite there yet.
              Because something may fail doesn’t mean it is useless. Because something may happen doesn’t mean it will.

              • WolfmanEightySix
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 days ago

                I never called it useless mate, I meant that it doesn’t have a hundred percent success rate for its original use.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              03 days ago

              Because its better then raw doggin, and pretty much the only option for preventing STDs at all, even if not 100%

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          03 days ago

          They are more effective at stopping STDs, STIs, and unwanted pregnancies than thoughts and prayers though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            03 days ago

            It feels like you just wanna argue for arguing’s sake.

            The condom isn’t perfect and shouldn’t be treated as such. As good as it may be, it’s not a panacea.

            And when it comes to sexual experimentation, depending on a thin piece of plastic to protect you from everything you might want to try is quite unrealistic.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              03 days ago

              I think we are not fundamentally disagreeing. Condoms alone are not a protection against all the bad things that could occur while sexually experimenting.

              My initial point was that if one is going to experiment, there are ways to mitigate risks. Condoms are one such measure, and they are ridiculously effective compared to the effort they require.

              Being sexually uneducated will still make things risky, but if I’m faced with someone who has decided to fuck their way through Europe, you bet the very least I would tell them is to always have a condom with them.

              Sortez couverts !