@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 days agoA weird phrase is plaguing scientific papers – and we traced it back to a glitch in AI training datatheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1326arrow-down16cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1320arrow-down1external-linkA weird phrase is plaguing scientific papers – and we traced it back to a glitch in AI training datatheconversation.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 days agomessage-square34fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish14•edit-211 days agoGoogle translate is using the same approach like an LLM. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Translate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_machine_translation So is DeepL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeepL_Translator And before they were using neural network approaches they used statistical approaches, which are subject to the same errors as a result of bad training data.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•11 days agoCheck the results though. Google translate is far far better at translation than a generic LLM.
Google translate is using the same approach like an LLM.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Translate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_machine_translation
So is DeepL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeepL_Translator
And before they were using neural network approaches they used statistical approaches, which are subject to the same errors as a result of bad training data.
Check the results though. Google translate is far far better at translation than a generic LLM.