I don’t know what to tell you, everyone I speak to who’s seen it would get an explanation that I hadn’t paid for a kinky childhood character to be painted on the side of my house and I don’t want it there…
I think it’s pretty harmless in this case. There are plenty of renditions of the Alice story with an older Alice and the story in general has become pretty synonymous with other adult topics (for example the general psychedelic aesthetic) that I don’t really connect it with the original character much.
But I can see how some other people might see it differently, so I guess it’s a fair call to not want it publicly shown.
Those might be the cocks of children, the cocks of men with severe mental disabilities unable to consent, or the cocks of the most hated warlords and dictators in the history. You’re displaying them for the world, you monster!
I would only have the leftmost … the Goofy-Blinky hybrid with a chain kink is just weird/too random to make much sense (or probably it’s just me not getting something)
I wouldn’t want the leftmost painted on the side of my house, the rest are okay tho
deleted by creator
tbh yeah
It’s easier to explain to people than why I have some kinky sex game character painted there.
It’s Alice in wonderland
I don’t think Alice’s heaving breasts and skin tight clothes are canon…
Alice is seven years old, dude.
Depends on the adaptation, in the Burton movie she’s 19
Which people?
The other people in the world??
The fuck kinda question is that?
All due respect, if I saw that painting on the side of a house, or even a painting I don’t like come to that, I am not looking for an explanation.
Okay…
I don’t know what to tell you, everyone I speak to who’s seen it would get an explanation that I hadn’t paid for a kinky childhood character to be painted on the side of my house and I don’t want it there…
Ahhh, I understand. It’s your choice to have whatever you want on your home.
The Mad Hatter with his dick out would be pretty hilarious, honestly.
deleted by creator
Especially since Alice was 7.
She’s clearly not here
Drawing a child character as a sexualized adult is weird and I wouldn’t want it on my streets
I think it’s pretty harmless in this case. There are plenty of renditions of the Alice story with an older Alice and the story in general has become pretty synonymous with other adult topics (for example the general psychedelic aesthetic) that I don’t really connect it with the original character much.
But I can see how some other people might see it differently, so I guess it’s a fair call to not want it publicly shown.
even if she’s 18 I wouldn’t wanna see that shit it’s just kinda trashy
That’s just subjective. I quite like the whole wall way better how it was than blank.
as opposed to cocks
Do you even know the canon age of those cocks!?! :D
Those might be the cocks of children, the cocks of men with severe mental disabilities unable to consent, or the cocks of the most hated warlords and dictators in the history. You’re displaying them for the world, you monster!
Oh … so definitely not each their own sentient entity walking, waddling, and bouncing around exploring the world?
Look at them little cocks go, so bravely venturing into the unknown …
which one of the 5 gazillion versions of the story? Pretty sure she isn’t seven in the tim burton version…
Oh, I don’t know, maybe the Disney version which she is dressed the same as. Very similar design. Context clues and all.
deleted by creator
I would only have the leftmost … the Goofy-Blinky hybrid with a chain kink is just weird/too random to make much sense (or probably it’s just me not getting something)