The trevors are named trevor.
Them be Trevors
This is the one grammatically acceptable time to use Thar
As somebody who worked in a place with 5 Dougs, I would say their names are Doug. Beyond that, they get descriptors. Angry Doug, Cool Doug, Vac-Former Doug, Smiley Doug, and Doug 2.
who is Doug 1?
Doug 2 was technically Doug 5. But we didn’t have a descriptor for him. Well, we could have called him “Blood Pressure Doug” but that’s kind of insensitive. And he wasn’t around long enough to figure out a better one.
Did the blood pressure get him then? sad sad end for Doug (2 | 5)
No! He just hated the job. Thank you for that, I got a good laugh. He came from a very structured place, where he had a very specific job. We were much smaller, and the scope of our positions covered a lot more, and our workflow was not what he was accustomed to.
Doug
DougDoug
DougDougDoug
DougDougDougDoug
Douglas
Are you specifically pointing out that both of their names are Trevor? Just because you know two Trevor, are you talking about both them?
Add one vote for “are”.
If you are referring to only one of the two, it is “their name is Trevor”. If you are introducing both of them at once (possible, but less likely), you would say “(both of) their names are Trevor”. Sometimes people also pluralise the name, e.g. “I’m friends with five Alices” or “I know two Bobs at work”
Both don’t sound right as they are ambiguous. “Their name is Trevor,” sounds like it is talking about a single person. “Their names are Trevor” feels incomplete. “They are both named Trevor” or Or “Their names are Trevor and Trevor” solves that ambiguity.
Their names is Trevor
And Trevor is his name-o
If the pair together have a name, the pair’s name “is Trevor” but if they’re each individually named Trevor, their names “are Trevor.”
The name has no plural here because it is the same: Their name is Trevor.
“Their names are Trevor and also-Trevor”.
I present: THE TREVORS
“These are the trevors”
“These are Trevors one and two”
I used to know 3 guys named Cody. Eventually their names evolved into Co-one, Co-two, and Co-three any time we were referring to them outside of individual.
“A Trevor trove of flavour lies within”.
“Who’s Trevor?”.
A treasure truase of flaasuure lies within
The sentence that comes to mind is “both of their names are Trevor.”
For your question, this conveniently reduces to “their names are Trevor.”
So there’s your answer.
