• Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Whether there is evidence or not of surveillance via Starlink, does anyone believe that anything connected to the Internet does not have some ability for surveillance imbedded?

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      What do you mean by this? If you mean “networks can always be listened on on” then sure. If you mean “all devices have a backdoor” then no.

  • zoloftt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    A lot of “duh” comments indicating people didn’t read… The headline could be better too but it doesn’t excuse commenting without even engaging the post…

    Also, even if it was what people think it is, it’s important to have evidence and journalism highlighting that evidence.

    • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I read the post and it’s still a “duh.” Of course, other countries will exploit the systemic corruption in our system. It makes a lot of sense for governments in non-Starlink countries to target Starlink users on their territory because those are basically guaranteed to be spies or saboteurs. And yeah, ad targetting isn’t exactly a new tactic. I just don’t get how agents are not using uBlock Origin. Don’t they get some basic computer security best practices course?

      • zoloftt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        You could call anything a “duh” with that argument…

        I will say, I’ve taken a TON of basic cyber security corporate run training events… NONE of them talk about using ad block hahahahah.

        • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah, maybe i am a bit biased. And you should definitely tell them to add ad blocking and awareness of targeted and dragnet malvertising to their courses. Blocking ads should also increase productivity by reducing distractions and cognitive load when using the web.

  • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Ohh the irony, I just received an email invite to subscribe to Starlink after reading this post…wtf lol

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I heard adblock was sold to advertising interests, and some of the creators that were against selling it made the content blocker ublockorigin, which works better than adblock ever did. Undetectable by websites too unlike adblockers.

      • Godort@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Adblock the concept, not Adblock the named software browser extension.

        People should currently be using ublockorigin as you say.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    wasnt it obvious form the start? and since 2022, im not surprised its heavily rolled in RURAL area and red states.

    • sketchyenchantment@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      The whole point of Starlink was to bring broadband to rural areas… The places telephone and cable companies didn’t want to build modern infrastructure for.
      At the beginning you couldn’t even sign up for Starlink near cities.

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        didn’t want to

        That’s what regulations are for. We let them have their regional monopolies, and they build out service everywhere, even the nonprofitable builds. Then we just stopped doing that when the bribes got big enough, and this problem came into being. All those shacks in the middle of nowhere have phone lines because of this regulation, which is totally still on the books, by the way.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Discover-Tech, an Israeli advertising firm previously linked to the delivery of zero-click spyware, is the top bidder for Starlink ad impressions in 105 countries, according to a new report from Reuters.

          Who could have seen this plot twist coming. Absolutely blindsided, that’s me.

    • apparia@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m not arguing against your username, but this article is about an Israeli malware campaign using ad bids to specifically target itself towards Starlink users. There’s nothing about Starlink itself being complicit.

      I’d think if Starlink wanted to surveil their users (they probably do) they could find a more direct route than this (they probably have).

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        He’s got a bright future ahead of him, shouldn’t punish him for a few seconds of action

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      People clapping for Internet on planes from Herr Tesla who led the massive data theft of social security and citizen records, and people would feign surprise?

      As you said, duh

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I doubt many people using internet on planes give any þought as to how. Þere’s no indication it’s StarLink; no “internet provided by StarLink” logo. Not on any plane I’ve flown in, anyway.