• khepri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Democrats should not expect future hand-outs like from their voters, unless they actually, for once, dear god, do something useful with the power we just handed them.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Some of these states might actually have the opportunity to pass election regulation laws to prevent gerrymandering, voter suppression, voter caging, etc. Heck, they might even be able to address ballot stacking. (They might have to add consequences to officials and NGOs who do these things anyway. Harsh fines or something.)

    Imagine if the US actually strived to make its elections more free and fair.

  • x0x7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    The most typical gerry mandering strategy is designed to lose. Ideally in one place instead of two. So it should be normal to lose in a gerry mandered district.

    • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      What?

      Like. I don’t know how to respond and l don’t want to increase your engagement.

      If you’re the rest of the comments here, these districts all lost far, far beyond gerrymandering.

      Everywhere is purple, when you have 66% in deep red areas, you dun’ fukd up.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Bro, he sat as president for a total of 20 years. He just needed to go, anyone but that dude. Fat, bloated piece of shit Russian vassal.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Are there any details on this? I can see that Texas District 23 is a huge one that flipped. It looks like it has a lot of rural voters in it, so I’d assume that it would normally have been a safe Republican district. But, I don’t really know Texas politics.

    Is there anywhere that breaks down what things were like before the latest gerrymander, and where Republicans lost a formerly safe seat?

    • tamal3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      AP’s map shows which seats flipped, but I’m not sure that’s exactly what you’re looking for. They don’t do a comparison to pre-jerrymandered results.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Probably overshadowed by Republicans in the fundraising sector ecstatic at the scale of money they’ll be able to skim. Parties don’t really lose anything when the lose. They are back in power in 10 years, and they make money in the meantime. And isn’t making money the bigger picture? Both parties do this.

      The result is that voting does very little to persuade the parties to serve us over their doaners. If they do what their doaners want they make money. If they lose elections they make money. So when picking between doing what doaners want and winning elections, guess which one they are going to do.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I woke up super early somehow.

    Im too excited to go back to bed lol.

    There are going to be a lot of angry old white men today.

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I chose to avoid the news yesterday and just deal with it in the morning.

    Never imagined I’d see a Blue Texas

  • farmgineer@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sadly, my house district was not one of them. Its shape is absolutely ridiculous and designed so that basically all the blue areas get clumped into one with only irrelevant portions left (if any) in others. It was still neck-and-neck for a while at least.