• pH3ra@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          There is nothing wrong in wanting sexual exclusivity, in the same way there is nothing wrong in wanting more than one partner.
          Seeing either as “oppression” is limited mindset.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t think anyone was trying to claim shaming culture wasn’t still around. I’m not sure what all entails to your use of the term monogamous domineers.

              Is the wife domineering over the husband by divorcing him? Wouldn’t that just allow him to be sexually liberated to sleep with whom he wants?

              What is the alternative in this scenario? For the man to continue being sexually liberal and force his wife to either adopt his views or be in a relationship structure she does not consent too?

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Also, I’m not the one down voting your responses. I’m not trying to be overly critical, I think you have a unique perspective and I’m just trying to comprehend fully what you are trying to say.

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I think that’s a bit patronizing, total sexual inclusivity is not a very large focus of anarchist literature as a whole.

                  In fact, Murray Bookchin is one of my favorite political writers.

        • Glytch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Making a lot of assumptions here.

          The women standing in this picture could be in a polycule situation with the dude at the table and he could be stepping out on all of them with the seated woman. It could be a group of single women playing a mean-spirited prank on their friend’s lame first date. It could also be completely fake and made for attention.

          I know there are a lot of monogamous people out there who talk shit about polyamory, largely out of ignorance or envy, but there’s no need to mirror that energy back at them. It won’t change their minds or stop the shit talk and it just increases the level of negativity surrounding the conversation. Remember, the sweetest revenge against your haters is to live your best life.

            • Spot@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              That link shows a chicken with pigtails?

              Anyway… being poly isn’t a bad thing. Being poly and lying to a partner that your monogamous, kinda is. If one party of a relationship changes their mind after commitments are made, the other party should be made aware before anything is acted on. If not, they are a lying piece of shit that can’t be trusted. Pretending to be monogamous just to trick someone into a relationship until your bored with them, despicable.

              Edit, lost my last word on posting.

  • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    AI? The text on the sign looks off to me. I hate how I can’t just enjoy funny pictures anymore. Every fucking image needs to be scrutinized.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    All 4 women look hot yet he looks like a sack of potatoes. How. I’m used to hot guys acting like assholes and average guys being the better partner. This guy is a glitch in the matrix?

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      All 4 women look hot thin yet he looks like a sack of potatoes (fat).

      Fixed that for you. Hope that helps clear things up.

          • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Fat people have fluffy faces. Anorexic people have skull faces. Neither are attractive. Anything in between have normal faces. The faces I prefer are in that category. Not all women in the picture qualify as material I fall for, but they do have facial qualities many do like.

            My partner has a little bit extra yet I drown inside when I see her face, I think she’s in the top when it comes to hotness. Not body wise, but I care about that less.