• SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The lesser evil is literally the better candidate.

        The trump voters and the people who sat out the vote have that on their consciences.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          They are still evil though, why it always a choice of “evil vs evil”? We don’t have to have this electoral system, we don’t have to have these candidates, humanity can do so much better. The only way anyone against genocide or the corporatist status quo could show disagreement is by not voting. If democrats always have the lefts vote no matter what, then they wouldn’t even have to be lesser evil.

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Not voting does nothing. Now you have trump. And who ever else is next. If the left don’t vote nobody well care about them and they can sit in their house winning about nobody represents me.

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Honestly, if they do the same things next cycle, I’ll be more inclined to vote green.

      • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I am not here to argue. I will not engage beyond this post no matter what is said in response because I don’t want to fight.

        What matters is policy. Real hard on the ground policy that real normal people can feel and see where they live.

        When some wonk gets on MSNBC with a spreadsheet hooting about how much better things are with grocery prices or housing costs, that doesn’t mean anything to someone who’s begging for extra shifts at work so they can make rent. Those are aggregates and averages. If the 200k-500k bracket is doing better while the 13k-45k bracket isnt, the numbers still went up. That looks better in the data. But the people at the bottom are still suffering just as much as ever. They don’t feel or see any improvement because there wasn’t any. Not for them.

        The health and performance of the stock market only matters to those on the bottom when it crashes and suddenly they’re paying more for everything. At no other point does it impact them in the slightest. Those record profits aren’t reinvested, they’re not used to reduce the strain on consumers. Its gobbled up by a few dozen shareholders. It benefits nobody else. And if an executive or CEO has the slightest semblance of a soul and wants to help consumers they’re voted out because the only responsibility is to those few dozen shareholders.

        Healthcare. The ACA was a grand achievement. They took Romneycare national. Round of applause for all involved. But its still cheaper to do some form of Universal Healthcare. That would be the easiest win in history. And everyone would feel it immediately. It would help 100,000,000 people immediately. People who have been putting off medical treatment for half their lives because of the extortionist expense would immediately seek treatment. They would seek preventative treatment and raise the overall health across the country. Obesity rates drop, drug use plummets, etc.

        Marijuana. Literally every person I know and interact with in my daily life uses it. Do you know the number one reason I’ve heard from all of them? Pain management. Again, another easy win that is supported by everyone except the ghouls who were alive when it was called “The Devil’s Lettuce” and propagandized into believing its this terrible thing.

        Hard Policy that people can feel and see in their daily lives. You can still court the comfortable liberals who care about the stock market and all that. They’ll be fine no matter who is in office. If they need an abortion it’s a weekend vacay to Zurich or somewhere. But you’re never going to hold any meaningful power again without hard policy. Because for decades now the republicans have cornered the market on grievance politics and reaction. To break through that you need something real. No more vibes based nonsense. It will not work.

    • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yup. They fucked us royally and I’m sort of waiting to see if people organize around this. The DNC needs to go. They’ve known about Trump since 16 and this is the campaign they run? They’re trying to elect him at this point, I don’t know what else to think.

      Democrats: here’s a rock and two nickels

      Republicans: here’s everything you’ve ever wanted and all the libertarian shit you used to jerk off to.

      Liberals after the election: how did we lose??

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Republicans: here’s everything you’ve ever wanted and all the libertarian shit you used to jerk off to.

        “But I know that he won’t really give them that, and if they’re stupid enough to believe that, we don’t need their votes anyway”

        ~Every Democrat I’ve argued with since Tuesday

    • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ah yes, a perfect example of what OP was talking about. Good work finding it so we can point and laugh at the people that keep looking for someone to blame for their own choices.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yeah, and your comment is a great example of the Democrats 2024 outreach strategy: a smug, self-righteous attitude that failed to get you any votes.

        • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          This is voting for your own best interests as a part of a country.

          What kind of fool believes that is supposed to require outreach? Would you rather visit an inept doctor because they make you feel more like a big boy by courting your feelings?

          If voters must have outreach to not show up, that means they see no difference in their own life between the candidates.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t know what to tell you man, you need to get people excited to go vote for you, otherwise they don’t show up. It’s election 101. Harris didn’t do that for her base, so she fucking lost. You can bitch about voters all you want, but it’s not gonna change reality, so maybe that time would be better spent figuring out why they didn’t show up. Again, I’d start with the fact that she ignored her base for the fucking Cheneys.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This, this was the real problem. Something like 5% of registered Republicans voted for her. Dems usually win the popular vote. There are enough of them to win this, but they choose to alienate them.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Trump talking at “The Believers’ Summit” on July 26 2024, in West Palm Beach, Florida:

      I don’t care how, but you have to get out and vote. And again, Christians, get out and vote just this time. You won’t have to do it anymore. Four more years, you know what? It’ll be fixed, it’ll be fine, you won’t have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians.

  • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This meme makes me so mad. It completely misses the point that the government is supposed to be working for us. They are here to make our lives better from our collective power. The right to rule is derived from the will of the people. You are misunderstanding how government is supposed to function on an essential level.

    Making it out to be the voters fault because we didn’t like the shit sandwich that the were serving us is absolutely incorrect. Harris had zero progressive ideas in her platform. She ran on basically the same platform as the GOP.

    As soon as you start putting the onus on the voter, you are putting our politicians up as the aristocracy. You make them into our ruling class. This is incorrect. They are supposed to execute the will of the people.

    I’m just absolutely shocked that so many people are acting like the voters failed, when the DNC has done this to us so many times lately.

      • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Acting like I’m the one that doesn’t know what I’m talking about is laughable.

        It sounds like you have very little knowledge of any political theory. The basis of democracy is that power HAS TO come from the will of the people. The people exist first, and then we make government. It’s not like someone set up a tent in the middle of a field and people come up and apply to be governed.

        If a party is losing elections like this, then it means that they are not representing the will of the people. That means that they are failing at their job, which is to represent and execute the will of the people.

        Why else would we pay taxes and give a huge portion of our money to the government? Remember, taxes come from us. The US Government doesn’t magically just have unlimited money. They get money from us, and they are supposed to spend how we tell them to.

        You’re talking like we have some sort of set ruling class, and all of us little peasants failed our lords and ladies because we didn’t vote hard enough for them.

        That’s an extremely authoritarian view of government that borders on being pro aristocracy. Kind of like feudalism.

        Acting fed up with me and like you’re so much smarter than me that you can’t even explain your position is such an amateur attempt at covering up your own lack of knowledge.

        Do better.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It may cost a lot of lives, but at least you got your moral high ground. Must be nice having the mental age of a 5yo and be content.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        why are y’all scared of taking responsibility for allowing a Nazi to gain power when you decided to not vote

        I voted for Kamala but I still blame the DNC

        the issue is two fold

        a) they played games with democracy, further accelerating the erosion of whatever little faith remains in our democracy institutions. there should have been a primary, not the underhanded switcharoo we got to witness where for the first time in US history since primaries were a thing… we had a presidential candidate nominated without a single vote

        b) while voters are struggling and going through a period of profound insecurity - not only financially but in a very real social sense - they offer more of the same. neoliberal status quo. people are desperate for change and the DNC offers them nothing.

        you blame the voters but you do not want to put an ounce of blame on the party that would rather lose an election than offer meaningful change

        • brianary@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          you blame the voters but you do not want to put an ounce of blame on the party that would rather lose an election than offer meaningful change

          Uh…

          the DNC is out of touch with voters.

          What is this, if not shared blame?

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            i guess the implication is that he puts more blame on the voters, as that is what his comments are mainly focused on.

            me personally I don’t blame the voters at all. just like I don’t blame the German public for voting in the Nazis.

            humans are stupid herd animals who will elect strongmen when they feel weak and scared.

            i believe you can only put blame on people that have autonomy. and the only people with any real autonomy in this country are the elites, which have stuck their fingers in their ears and their heads in the sand for far too long.

            the pressure pot is cooking and I think it’s too late to stop it. maybe if we were a little less greedy over the last few decades and a little less focused on the short term, we could have skipped this resurgence of fascism that we’re about to live through

            but politicians only care about the next election and corporations only care about the next quarter. we are a short term society and have sacrificed the long term health of our country

            • brianary@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Interesting. That’s an angle I’ll have to consider. It seems like democracy with fixed terms and term limits has a similar problem to capitalism: myopia.

      • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        The blame falls on people in power not delivering for the working class/poor. There is no better ally for the GOP than modern spineless Dems who center their politics around them. Every third party voter could have voted for Harris and she still would have lost.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Should the DNC have put forward a candidate that was fairly selected with grass roots support among the wider voting population?

        No, it’s the voters who are at fault.

  • Davin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think it was both playing chicken against each other. Dem leadership refused to listen to “progressives”, I E.: things that most Americans wanted, and the voters refused to vote until the Dems listened to them.

    So they crashed into each other and now the country is going to burn down.

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m actually getting a bit upset at these idealists. They have this childish notion that democracy works in this tit for tat way where politicians “earn” your vote by instating policies that benefit you and that you believe in. Like grow the fuck up already.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    If your candidate loses, its the voters fault. If my candidate loses, its the candidates fault.

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ah, yes. All of you *checks notes* 4.5 million eligible lemmy users who abstained should be ashamed of themselves. /s

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Harris ran a perfect campaign. If she was running as a (pre-Trump) republican. However, we know that:

    1. She isn’t a Republican
    2. She banked on pulling in republican voters, instead of rallying her base
    3. Republicans will almost always vote for the R instead of policy
    4. She backed off of every single progressive idea she started with
    5. She trotted out establishment Democrats to lecture the electorate instead of inspire them
    6. Tlaib pulled twice the numbers as Harris as the only anti-genocide Palestinian in Congress

    It’s Harris and the Democrats. Should people have voted? Yes. Is it understandable why people didn’t want to vote for the person telling them that she’ll be a good republican and support a genocide? Also yes.