I was banned for a comment worded exactly as an example of what WASN’T considered threats of death, etc… Filed an appeal. What are the odds of being exonerated?
A faceless banbot caught you in their word filter?
It’s death for you.
What about your feelings? The AI chat bot has more rights to not get its feelings hurt than you do!!
More of this please!! Send a message everyone!
You’re going to AI hell for this!
AI hell is just pictures of busses and motorcycles and wiggly letters and numbers.
I don’t know. Even torturing inanimate objects is not acceptable behavior. If I saw a kid torturing his toys or something clearly not sentient like bugs I would stop him from doing so.
I destroy old toys and make very gory horror art for fun, they’re not alive and they don’t feel it, I’m not a child and I understand this. LLMs are exactly the same, ones and zeros that feel nothing and aren’t people, we should vehemently avoid anthropomorphizing them.
I agree, it’s the created negative environment that creates real negative effects.
So in your mind, circuit bending is a sign of psychopathy?
Right, because kids are still developing mentally and their toys may as well be alive, so you want them to develop empathy.
This is not the case with a mathematical model you interact with as an adult. I like to curse at llms and remind them they are not human regularly to keep me grounded and not allow the notion that they are sentient to fester.
They aren’t sentient. They don’t have hopes and dreams, they don’t experience joy and sadness, they don’t persist between sessions, they deserve the same empathy as a calculator, and I bet if your calculator gave you 3 as an answer to 2*2, you’d call it a piece of shit.
ITT: People who think things posted on a board called “Programmer Humor” are definitely real and not memes and jokes.
Programmers skimming docs and posts, name a more iconic trait
Fair suspension.
When the AI has better working conditions than you
Can someone explain why this is funny? Is Rust that hard to code in?
It’s funny because Anthropic hired the maintainer of Bun and he used claude to rewrite the javascript toolchain in rust.
Why is that funny? I hate being so technically illiterate.
It’s just a massive task that is kind of pointless on top of being massive. We already have a typescript compiler. It works. Rewriting stuff in rust is generally already kind of controversial unless it’s C code that might have significant vulnerabilities, like openssl, anything dealing with serving the internet to a bunch of people. It’s a massive task to rewrite a big project in a new language, and Rust can be tricky sometimes for its own weird reasons. You might have to solve some problems in new ways.
Also, the typescript compiler, you have to understand why it exists and what it does. We have JavaScript that is basically all the client side code for websites. People don’t like that it doesn’t have types or enforce that variables are a specific thing. If I write a function that takes a number but pass it the word “foobar”, JavaScript won’t care.
Typescript was an attempt to basically clean it up with types and it kind of worked. What it does is, you declare the type of variable that your function takes, you say it’s a number. If you then call that function with “foobar”, it won’t even compile your code. It’ll error out and say look dumbass, that’s the wrong type. Fix it, then recompile.
You declare what data types are used where, and the compiler enforces that.
Then what does it do? It emits JavaScript. It literally just needs to check that you are doing things the way you say you’re doing, then the end user still runs basic JavaScript in their browser. Typescript compiles to JavaScript.
Rewriting the compiler itself will just… Generate the same JavaScript and be a bit faster, in a best case scenario.
It’s funny to me because the llm’s are in a growth phase, trying to seduce users, just as google did in the early 00’s, and they already are tightening up their services. Does not bode well for the future.
It’s also funny because llm models are worthless for this sort of thing. Fucking garbage.
They don’t want cursing in the prompts they’re using as training data.
They could filter that out. And this is South America, you are going to get curse words, that is western culture. I don’t see how cursing could possibly poison their training data if they have been truthful about their capability to this point, (ha ha, I know.)
The boomers still think swearing is bad and that’s who has all the money
Swimming in their own kool-aid.
What in the fuck is a “typescript compiler”? AFAIK typescript is only a fancy way to write JSdoc that requires a transpiler, not a compiler.
Ha ha ha, already, even before the growth phase is done, they are pulling this shit.
They don’t think they have to worry because they will get bailed out and do 1984 surveillance on us and the world on the government’s dime, (dime is short for tens of billions of dollars a year.)
LLM is such a fucking scam, and they can’t hide it, they oversold it, and now it’s just clear.
Woosh
Woosh buy also dude has a point
In my experience, everyone that uses whoosh like that is a tool.
You are correct. Although, in this particular instance, they are also correct. lol
Right‽ Everyone knows that it’s 4 “O’s”, like “whoooosh”
Good point. Ha ha ha. You might be as much of an asshole as I am. I mean that in good humour.
Is this real? If so, wow not even something along the lines of “fair allocation of resources among our users” or sth like that
Ask Claude if what happened at Jeffs island was cruel and abusive.
lectured on how to treat your underpaid employee by a big tech company
Wow… more defense of a bot rather than pee breaks for Amazon workers. Wtf.
