Just knowing a way to break his mind can be so simple is good to know.

  • Riskable
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 month ago

    The correct response is to do as he asks… Respectfully remove the painting.

    Then replace it with a picture of an orange baby and put his name on the plaque.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The actual backstory on this (referenced in the article) is even more absurd.

      That spot which is supposed to have Trump’s picture was empty for quite a while because they were having trouble raising money for it. But then someone smuggled in a literal picture of Putin and hung it in its place. Colorado Republicans had no trouble raising the money after that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Tbh it seems like a very flattering depiction of him?

    Like, no jowls, no mouth-eyes.

    What’s his issue with it?

    • FiveMacs
      link
      fedilink
      01 month ago

      Because it isn’t his ‘brand’ image…it’s not him visually and doesn’t make him look like the sack of shit he wants to be portrayed as

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        This is his brand of image:

        Official portrait of Donald Trump

        “Sinister” is the word you’re looking for.

        And if this seems vaguely familiar, here’s why:

        Sinister portrait of Chancellor Adam Sutler

        Sinister portrait of Big Brother

        Sinister portrait of Adolf Hitler

        Dictators, fictional and real alike, love sinister portraits of themselves.

        • nocturne
          link
          fedilink
          01 month ago

          “Sinister” is the word you’re looking for.

          Not it is not. Obama was sinister, Trump is dexter. Us south-paws have it hard enough without trying to push him on us too.

        • [email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 month ago

          He just looks like he’s sucking on a caramel and not sure how to release its grip from his palate. He’s delusional, if he thinks he can look tough while in his infirm 80s

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    01 month ago

    If I had money, I would buy this artwork and organize to have it displayed everywhere and covered massively by the media to piss him off.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      01 month ago

      It should be the only reference image ever used in any news story about him, as should Drag Queen Putin for that shit bag.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 month ago

    I mean its bad, but it doesnt look intentionally mocking. Only piss babies would care. I wouldnt even care if someone drew me as the devil with a dick in each hand, hell yeah man art it up.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I mean, it’s better than I could afford to pay someone to do a portrait of me.

      I could maybe afford a caricature artist, but not a real painter portrait artist.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 month ago

        Seriously, its not like the picture of that wealthy Aussie cunt. Or of King Charles with the red everywhere.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 month ago

    Im fine if we remove all presidential portraits from both this term and the last. I would say I would like to wipe this whole period from the history books but we need the cautionary tale.